This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
退伍军人再就业，动作戏比较真实，虽然开头就隐隐约约有猜到啦，但枪战戏还是挺紧张刺激的，就是虎头蛇尾咯…
电影中规中矩 枪战和搏斗部分有些拉 处理的不好 另外特种兵生存技能 自救和施救 近距离战斗片段和搜房男主都下了功课 值得表扬 战友中枪中的莫名其妙 这就是退役特种兵吗。。 ps：科学家是“海豹六队成员”“安全屋老头是极寒城的特工/间谍” 电影里面讲的是为了消灭“恐怖分子”而行动 真相是“恐怖分子”发明疫苗的科学家是为了阻止星条旗释放病毒而被杀 回到现实头皮发麻 地球之癌 美国!
为啥一定要杀男主？需要他背黑锅？似乎不需要，感觉这一点没处理好，后面的剧情就变得很牵强。
贪婪掩盖过诚信 终究防不住暗箭
近期一口气看完的佳作，埃夫隆是有野心的演员
立意从名字就能猜出来，整体凑合可看，但有几点逻辑上硬伤太明显了。
为啥一定要杀男主？需要他背黑锅？似乎不需要，感觉这一点没处理好，后面的剧情就变得很牵强。
节奏略慢，近乎无理性的行为，剧情单一，是我就选择开车离开的那个，毕竟占主动权
一般般吧，最后策反那里还有点张力，后面复仇我是确实没看懂，可能配角不死就对不起男主？
其他都不错，就是剧情太垃，看完毫无波澜，惊悚不惊悚，深度没深度，更是被男主作死行为弄懵逼了
30.野心的编剧写出啰嗦繁琐的不合格剧本。
故事太过简单，动作场景也是。还有最疑惑的就是花那么大代价去灭口加上巨额安家费，怎么就不能够安排他回来呢
似乎一些描述非常精准映射了自己，但实际它往往模糊笼统，以致普遍适用，称为巴纳姆效应
两个贪婪的蠢批，坑填上一起回去租拖车不就行了吗?
小成本制作，荒野守金夺金，在巨大财富面前，要相信人性的黑暗，另外，在荒野要明白自然法则，你是自然的一部分，你也是别人和动物的猎物。
不止5.8的成绩，拉一拉。在很多好莱坞故事里，美国政府才是最坏的那个政府，影射这次病毒就是美国政府给放出来的，还要对研究出疫苗的科学家斩草除根。
故事线很弱，重点在突出退役兵成为雇佣军的内心挣扎。不好看也不难看。
2022年了，还拍这种cliche认真的吗？
发生于某时某地荒漠中的故事，基本上属于独角戏。如果是个好演员来演，再加上一个老练一些的导演，影片还会是有可观性的。现在的演员太嫩了，又是一个人见人欺的样子，这样的荒野片就很难吸引人了。影片的结尾还不错，结束得干脆利落，不拖泥带水。
拿弓弩的女人长得实在太像会不断复生的死人了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
