A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
观看过程中我一直很迷惑：这是拍给谁看的电影呢？现在的小学生吗？想让他们喜欢这种上世纪九十年代质感的脸谱化故事，未免太小看他们了；给儿时看郑渊洁作品的成年人？小时候喜欢郑作品的这群人，数量少，长大后在精神层面也难免会有些挑剔，这种水准的制作也难取悦他们。不过片子的完成度很高，皮皮鲁、鲁西西的选角很合适，放在十年前或许会更成功。
笑声和眼泪齐飞，暗黑共“正能量”一色。
儿童电影，还不错。某些镜头小人还是蛮有绿幕感的，感觉小人用动画呈现会不会好点？
很不错的片子。最后我也猛男落泪了……没什么大毛病，儿童片能有这样的水准就可以了
还是会感动～～～(o^^o)小学的记忆3.7🌟
还可以。但是这改编离原著恐怕云泥之别差的不是一两点。
简而言之吧 郑渊洁的皮皮鲁是大人也可以看的 这个电影并不是 只是个情怀罢了 可惜了
唔，还是期待出第二部的
3、片尾很好地向小朋友介绍了特效场景是如何拍摄，以及拍摄中的酸甜苦辣；
突然发现童话电影在国内也是个贫瘠区…除了七仔好像就找不到其他同类型电影的类比项了…
这个选角想打一星，为什么皮皮鲁选了一个就鲁西西弟弟一样的小男孩？？？PS: RH阴性血那段印象太深刻了，就是这个小说让我知道还有这个血型的
希望你能永远童心不泯
带小妹妹去看，影厅都是差不多大的孩子们。 很适合给父母看的教育片。 看花絮小演员们辛苦了👍🏻
成长轨迹毫无交集的咱俩，作为郑渊洁的老粉，《罐头小人》成了我和蒲蒲共同的儿时回忆（虽然已经记不太清剧情了）。依稀记得歌唱家是贝塔的老婆，电影里说他们的老家是魔方大厦——读书不光是为了抓分数，更重要的是学会爱。郑氏宇宙YYDS～
一，里面喜剧特别特别多，很好笑
别用你看似高级的观点来矫情 20多年前的故事 bug还是有的 但仍然是童年的正确打开方式 少年时藏在柜子内的一摞童话大王 圆满了 郑渊洁yyds
呃...为小朋友们努力贡献的演技打call...虽然演技也不咋滴，但看出来 是用心了～制作实在尴尬...蛮好的故事...可惜了，哎～
没有写好友情。
鲁西西有一条完美的人物弧光，皮皮鲁自始至终没有成长，有些遗憾
广州百丽宫影城超前点映，等13号上影再详细点评，可以是今年遇到一部有趣的电影🎬
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
