宜宾县二中 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 喜剧片 2018

导演: 迪克·麦斯

剧情介绍

  6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful.
  A brilliant and outragously funny satire of society, 7 December 1999
  Author: Dave Joerg ([email protected])
  "Flodder" is one of the funniest movies ever made and few people realise that it is a Dutch movie made by none other than the Holland version of John Carpenter, the famous Dick Maas, author and director of the thriller "Amsterdamned". The Flodder family is the reincarnation of the term a-social. When the whole family bunch, basically all bastards, criminals and sluts must be relocated from their City slum because of toxic waste under their house, the city council house no choice. The only available space is in the "Zoendal" - the "Sun Valley" the best area in Amsterdam where all doctors, snobs and businessmen can afford to live their lives. And where the central point of interest and politics is the tennis club of the community. The Flodder family brings devastation to the tranquil world that ruled before. They are simply unbelievable. The characterisation is incredibly funny, beginning with Ma Flodder who searches other people's trash cans for food or making illegal liquor in her cellar and ending with the eldest daughter who is the biggest slut on earth. Together they make the most horrible family imaginable, a sort of immoral mirror image to the Brady Bunch or the Waltons. When the City counsel of Amsterdam hoped that the Flodders would show their good will to be more civilised in their new area, it turns out that Holland's most famous family would rather bring out the worst in the rich people of "Sun Valley"-wonderland. The rest is a hilarious, brilliant and well made social satire that can be watched as a provocative movie as well as a straightforward comedy. Dick Maas at his best. I salute him! Flooder was the Dutch smash hit in 1986 and brought two sequels and a tv series. All of the sequels were nice but not as great as the original.
  Flodders (1986) is available on DVD in Germany in a dubbed German version in Dolby Digital 5.1. under the name:
  "Flodders -Eine Familie zum knutschen"
  Why is First Floor Features, the producer of the movie not bringing the Dick Maas blockbusters out on DVD in the Netherlands, I wonder. The are not even available on video there. These movies have so much potential, still to this day and have a huge silent but true following.

评论:

  • 香枫 5小时前 :

    站在现在真的很难理解为什么有那么好的机会的情况下要坚持desi来演丈夫…一种时代的无语吧

  • 纳喇美曼 5小时前 :

    女主太灵了吧!小小的身体,大大的能量。导演很会通过小动作和镜头塑造人物,全程不累!很难得的一部人工智能+女性话题的片子,小而美。

  • 骏勇 1小时前 :

    只是OK,但是对于艾伦·索金来说OK就算很差了。

  • 祁瀚林 6小时前 :

    3.0。前段遠好於後段。攝影機以仰視和俯視進行自由移動或近身跟隨,配合靜止特寫時的大量廣角變形,成功描摹出數字極權時代無孔不入的監視網絡。而當這一套攝影母題停留於室內時,同樣重現了疫情居家時期的幽閉感。但這套技法在後段街景中不斷重複,不過是為了掩蓋機位糟糕和爛俗的科幻文本。對《後窗》偷窺結構的挪用也並未完成當下語境改造。

  • 詹初珍 5小时前 :

    ——你们注定会分开,没有人像你们相爱,但是他们平淡无趣反而得到了求不得的可以永远在一起的诅咒。

  • 波痴凝 5小时前 :

    这几年女权电影太多了,今年连固定传记片也都是女性传记片,论表演劳模在《塔米·菲的眼睛》里的表演我更喜欢。论剧本这部好于塔米·菲的眼睛。

  • 畅映冬 0小时前 :

    看得很过瘾。而且这种90分钟的电影已经很少了,所以很珍惜。

  • 月云 1小时前 :

    记住一句很random的台词 'The world he is from has a very narrow definition of manhood.' 哪里又不是这样。

  • 枫灵 9小时前 :

    我就是很爱艾伦索金

  • 贝鸿轩 4小时前 :

    剧情不算复杂,还是挺有现实感、科技感的,索德伯格的手法和感觉还行,只是最后女主拿射钉枪解决几个家伙的过程简单了点,欠点说服力。另外,多好的智能设备也怕断电,那些人居然这点常识也没有吗?

  • 楠惠 0小时前 :

    世界上还有比这长的更像妮可基德曼的吗?结果是整容过度变老后的妮可。

  • 琛佳 7小时前 :

    表演很赞!但是电影实在是不好看。妮可虽然明显脸僵,但演得还是够传神,电影没有她的表演会失色更多。可惜整部电影没有给她更高光的表演时刻。巴登那个影帝提名该给小李子。

  • 锦蓓 3小时前 :

    一般般,比较少见的反映智能电子产品正面的设定。虽然只有不到90分钟,主线简单支线却很散,部分运镜还可以。床戏裸露真的可有可无,只当福利。互相偷窥神TM换来个莫名其妙的见义勇为。还以为结局要和肥宅在一起呢,结果就是一个挡刀的路人甲。记住两个知识点:钉枪绷住当枪使,杀人能治社恐症。

  • 通天薇 3小时前 :

    轻盈,灵动,锋利,从《丧心病狂》开始,索德伯格以极简主义的姿态进行数字媒介的创作探索,这部片子感觉是他近几年状态最好的一部作品。

  • 曼楠 6小时前 :

    意料之外地很流畅,没觉得插叙让时间线混乱,反而看完有种醍醐灌顶的感觉。需要去补一补历史了,但缺乏背景知识也不影响对电影的理解。蛮舒服的一部。

  • 板雅容 6小时前 :

    3.5 大数据裸奔&新冠&社交焦虑。新媒体时代的《放大》,可惜各方面点到即止,但是本就是爽片,最后的气钉枪够了。第一次出门时的不平稳构图、俯拍、声音的处理真是动了一些小聪明。类型片请不要再超过120min了…>_<…我真的好想要她那个键盘啊,高在的键盘也是这样的,感觉真的巨好用…跟女主的家居环境相比,我就不是现代人啊(o^^o)

  • 蒿山雁 2小时前 :

    虽然我也只在television history课看过几集I Love Lucy,但是巴登和Desi Arnaz真的完全不像,反而看之前无法想象的Nicole Kidman在化妆加持下还有点Lucille的影子(声音模仿也有努力)这部和同为传记片的乔布斯模式比较相似,截取短短几天时间辅以大量闪回,不过闪回处理得不好(不如不闪)结尾给了个分量很足的Oscar moment

  • 申屠光霁 5小时前 :

    7/10,混入了太多议题了,再加上大段大段的台词,容易让人找不到重点,也难以细细回味。

  • 纪凝绿 1小时前 :

    Literally cliche that could be happening everywhere in the world with a totally opposite ending. Fighting back for freedom and democracy is a fantasy, just as the final scene of the film where nobody wears mask under the morning sunshine.

  • 暴冰洁 8小时前 :

    艾伦·索金在本片中依然展示出其在台词和剧本结构方面的创作才能,借助尼可(继《时时刻刻》后再次作出形象上的巨大突破)和哈维尔出色的演驿,通过戏中戏的形式将一出明星婚姻往事拍得戏剧性十足。遗憾的是作为故事核心的夫妻之间那些狗屁倒灶的事属实无趣,而对于麦卡锡主义问题导演的态度也较为暧昧。对比索金的前几部作品,既没有《七君子》的积极性,也没有《茉莉牌局》的娱乐性,更没有《乔布斯传》对角色的深度挖掘。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved