Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
在我心目中只有第一部和第三部比较好看。这一部实属有些滑水～
其实从第二部开始，就与“旅社”没啥关系了，但依然很有趣，纯粹的娱乐做到了极致。
我宣布这是今年最佳春节档~要啥有啥的国产动画片，谁能拒绝可爱的猫猫呢？
和旅社已经没啥关系了，与精灵紧密相关的笑点也所剩无几。主题又回到了第一部的家庭关系上，但相比之下讲得太过肤浅，作为系列完结作只能说是差强人意……
还行吧，毕竟呢，设身处地不是嘴上说，得你真是处在这种境地。反正就热热闹闹无厘头喜剧。不能深究。身份互换挺好玩
而当我看到片尾那个主题公园脑海中立刻浮现迪士尼的标志时，我再次开始怀疑它在“引领潮流”这方面究竟发挥着多大的重要性。
最后那个广告好硬啊。
文青们都低估熊出没大电影，明明是真正的春节档最强，分数不太行也就是小朋友们都不来打分
真心不错，特效剧情到位，我小的时候怎么没有这么好的电影？
电影很紧凑好看，OST好听，最重要的核心———看世界上美好的一面，就像棉花糖 依然是那么香甜！✨🌸
大战场面不输大片，故事适合小朋友。开始几分钟是重影，我还以为是我3D眼镜坏了。😓其实没必要做成3D，真的。
太老套，太聒噪，太无聊了。这么难看还拍到第四部，也难怪迪士尼停滞不前，同行真的一点压力都给不到。
人变成怪物&怪物变成人，感情线无聊，也就零星笑点还能看
相爱一家人，五一乐翻天。
好低幼啊，但我好喜欢动画片，就还挺喜欢的。这个系列到此结束吧就，不然就有点消磨了
但惊艳的是影片对于色彩的应用，大胆应用色彩，两个人在丛林中行走时，背景一直在切换，且都是暖色调的色彩，琳琅满目，心旷神怡。
道德綁架嘛！我是你女婿你就要愛我，你的旅館就要讓我經營，我是你女兒你就得愛我愛的人，你的就是我的。什麼鬼~
就怎么说呢，经历了三部电影，drac还是觉得自己家白菜被猪拱了呗，就这种老丈人和女婿的，有fockers那种设定，但是！！这部并不是很欢乐搞笑，和1差距太远太远了，而且这种人和怪物的转变，也就很表面，里面drac的配音不是adam s，就没有那种感觉了，而且mavis这部也很配角啊，感觉她边缘化真的不应该，I mean， every1 loves her，对她这么少戏份很不满意。well好在就是，这部prime上了，省了去影院的时间和钱lol
我们一家三口第一次一起去汽车电影院 很开心 所以要满分纪念一下👨🏻👩🏻👧🏻
前三部没看过，感觉还可以，看个开心，就是感觉有点短
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
