剧情介绍

  6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful.
  A brilliant and outragously funny satire of society, 7 December 1999
  Author: Dave Joerg ([email protected])
  "Flodder" is one of the funniest movies ever made and few people realise that it is a Dutch movie made by none other than the Holland version of John Carpenter, the famous Dick Maas, author and director of the thriller "Amsterdamned". The Flodder family is the reincarnation of the term a-social. When the whole family bunch, basically all bastards, criminals and sluts must be relocated from their City slum because of toxic waste under their house, the city council house no choice. The only available space is in the "Zoendal" - the "Sun Valley" the best area in Amsterdam where all doctors, snobs and businessmen can afford to live their lives. And where the central point of interest and politics is the tennis club of the community. The Flodder family brings devastation to the tranquil world that ruled before. They are simply unbelievable. The characterisation is incredibly funny, beginning with Ma Flodder who searches other people's trash cans for food or making illegal liquor in her cellar and ending with the eldest daughter who is the biggest slut on earth. Together they make the most horrible family imaginable, a sort of immoral mirror image to the Brady Bunch or the Waltons. When the City counsel of Amsterdam hoped that the Flodders would show their good will to be more civilised in their new area, it turns out that Holland's most famous family would rather bring out the worst in the rich people of "Sun Valley"-wonderland. The rest is a hilarious, brilliant and well made social satire that can be watched as a provocative movie as well as a straightforward comedy. Dick Maas at his best. I salute him! Flooder was the Dutch smash hit in 1986 and brought two sequels and a tv series. All of the sequels were nice but not as great as the original.
  Flodders (1986) is available on DVD in Germany in a dubbed German version in Dolby Digital 5.1. under the name:
  "Flodders -Eine Familie zum knutschen"
  Why is First Floor Features, the producer of the movie not bringing the Dick Maas blockbusters out on DVD in the Netherlands, I wonder. The are not even available on video there. These movies have so much potential, still to this day and have a huge silent but true following.

评论:

  • 蚁山兰 1小时前 :

    出版业的华尔街的狼,第三幕还不错,前两幕太拖沓了。

  • 赫连新梅 9小时前 :

    及格,有好活儿有烂活儿,TV的恶劣表现会延续并影响后续相关作品是必然的,但好在因为篇幅和主创人员的调整,这部联动剧场版起码比tv观感要好一些

  • 潘听南 5小时前 :

    特利迦是科学获得神光棒,邪特是神学获得;

  • 鞠湛霞 1小时前 :

    侮辱我的智商…剧本逻辑不好怎么办?那干脆没有逻辑好了

  • 炳栋 9小时前 :

    tv中的尴尬情节和奇怪人设依旧延续。剧场版补充了一点设定,画面的质感和打斗也有了提高,顺便奠定了男二的女主地位。但bug太多,故事也很紧凑。

  • 鄢浩然 6小时前 :

    比TV好看多了,但特利迦也太那个了,连邪恶特利迦还要打那么久。

  • 顾代丝 1小时前 :

    谁都可以成为光,一个人可能不会发光,但是要链接他人的心,这才是真正的光

  • 枫洁 1小时前 :

    你说你超古代巨人一代代换了多少人,改过不拉,换汤不换药,人家欧布也有理由说的啊,我借的是什么力量,那是光之国的力量,你这批人是什么人?两个特利迦加一个泽塔打不过一个特利迦,还要一个妹子去借力量,脸都不要了。

  • 祁意 6小时前 :

    再加上昨天看完OOO的十周年剧场版后,我对“情怀”真的是要有ptsd了

  • 珍梓 4小时前 :

    这部巴尔扎克写于两百年前的大部头,虽为当时法国定制的时代画像,貌似放在当下也非常适用。两名充满理想抱负的青年人,来到繁华巴黎走一遭后,灯红酒绿的金钱社会,尔虞我诈的文化界,很快把两人折磨的体无完肤,迷失自我。不可否认巴尔扎克的巨大文学贡献,但片中大段大段碎碎念的旁白令人非常不适,都不只是浓缩小说的问题。赢得2021凯撒7项大奖8项提名。6.8

  • 疏又夏 6小时前 :

    难得看到一部根据十九世纪名著改编的作品,影片展现了那个时代巴黎光怪陆离的生活。令人震惊的是,那个年代的记者、文人,与今天的几乎没什么两样,只有衣着有些变化,其做法、想法、手法都与现今一模一样。影片整体说拍得有些四平八稳,但对年代的还原、服化道的制作,都很值得一看。

  • 续安康 9小时前 :

    背靠大师,导演也是任性。感觉是对的,但叙述视角的旁白有时很出戏,都是现成的金句,但导演用得蛮浪费感情的。

  • 辰然 8小时前 :

    这剧情新生代正常水平,但比其他的剧场版要好,致敬迪迦的部分也不会太刻意。

  • 雯文 7小时前 :

    我本以为遥辉的清醒会闪过一些画面

  • 茹昆颉 5小时前 :

    迪迦豆瓣9.6分,特利迦6.9

  • 纳喇美曼 0小时前 :

    「幻灭」可谓是一次非常扎实(毫无创新)的戏剧呈现,人物的姿态被华丽(做作)地倾泻出来,戏谑(自大)的语气被(生硬)安置在情景的各处,流畅而又惊诧(无趣 过誉)。卢西安沉醉于声色犬马的巴黎(趋近于零的说服力),却仍眷恋诗歌爱情的闪光(令人疲倦的矛盾与挣扎),作为最具代表性的理想主义自缢者形象与其它青年作家故事同样脆弱撕裂(老套),巴尔扎克原著的魅力在影片中熠熠生辉(除却文本,影像部分完全不值一提),足以带人们回到那个思想被党派之争碾碎的19世纪(现代性的延伸匮乏),多兰的第三视角旁白确实为之增光添彩不少(仅剩的亮点)。这个极具张力(无节制)的故事最终能够警示(说教)和启迪(造作)是:我们每个人心中都住着两个相互纠缠的灵魂,稍不留神就会被时代的迷雾所无情吞噬。——来自您熟悉的朋友吕邦普雷(夏东)

  • 阎雨竹 7小时前 :

    来了个新队长,以为很叼,没想到是反派,还变身邪恶特利迦,最后被干死。

  • 茹萱 7小时前 :

    UGC发邮件邀请的神秘首映,去看之前连是哪部片都不晓得。印象中很少看这种法国古装电影。一边看一边进入电影节奏和故事。有时巴尔扎克式的讽刺性旁白算是增添了几分趣味,但有的时候会让人觉得有点让人昏昏欲睡和冗长。不大喜欢男主的长相,不过演这种虚荣一心向上爬结果一无所有的不讨好角色倒也正好。多兰上镜竟然演的很不错。说到媒体的骚操作,看来是自古以来都有的啊。喜欢描述巴黎19世纪的街头场景和布景。

  • 朴寄波 6小时前 :

    谁都不喜欢那种努力了很久但最终一切落空、终究回归幻灭的感觉,这个故事对于当下也有很多的隐喻和讽刺,人类有时候真是没有进步,不断重复过去的错误。也许错的是那个时代,但终究人也不是完美无缺的,如若没有贪婪和无限的欲望,也就不会有幻灭了。小人物的生活总是悲喜剧,不足够努力,就无法真正跨越阶级,徒有的虚名也终究只是镜花水月罢了。

  • 曦馨 2小时前 :

    虽然不是个好故事,但是跟TV比已经是矮子里挑高个了

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved