Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
几乎是第一部的套拍，完全延续了前作的一切「二次元」属性，中二感极强。「体育祭」陡然见证了佐野勇斗的颜杀，为何第一部就是个不折不扣的路人甲呢？「奉心祭」则处理的更为精妙，既有收尾之前的悬念设置，又有结尾惊心动魄的感人至深。可以说是给系列映画来了一个完美的FINAL，平野紫耀与环奈火花也相较之前强了很多，不错。
他两其实真的蛮有cp感 别把我磕死 梗太多了吧我说 sho在那里唱辛迪瑞拉 还有kanna的京子 笑死 最后的心形气球磕死 结局真的烂很好呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜
这故事，前半部分（南澳岛阶段）能赢得一部分观众的喜爱，小镇青年狂放不羁泡妞飙车的碎片式生活被镜头展现的淋漓尽致；后半部分（来广州后）也可能会有观众喜欢，一线城市里小人物的爱情和男主为了爱情拼尽全力试图逆风翻盘的理想化行为最终化为泡影。但，当前半部分和后半部分糅合进一部电影中，就有了一种不伦不类感，假如没有前半部分的铺垫，后半部分男女主在广州打拼的内容，单拎出来，虽然不接地气但至少不会令人如此反感....本片证明了，韩寒导演还是适合拍点金句频出的小品电影，不适合放大电影主题，小镇青年走向城市的故事，是一个社会性大命题，韩寒驾驭不了。。
前面一半有点儿无聊 可能因为看了两季动画 没有动画那么搞笑 藤原书记的表现好出戏看着好尴尬=͟͟͞͞(꒪⌓꒪*) 会长的🎈气球告白真让人眼前一亮！空气都是粉色的了~ “你要去远方了 所以我把不死药给你”辉夜送出❤️钥匙扣的这句话 听着就甜甜的~ 搞笑又圆满的结局好棒！ p.s.会长扮演者侧颜有点点像刘德华
。。。hh
听说漫画剧情已经在暴走了？这真人版的结局真不错
幸好提前看了点历史，不然更晕..../ lars 演技真的棒……
石上那里好棒呀 有那么一丢get千年 cue了花晴什么的 好想看紫耀演不良
尬穿地心 是年纪不对了吗 感觉两部电影只有两首歌好
三星多四星少系列，不过既然大家都给得不多，那就四星吧
开头尬，不过后期发力不错，比第一部好一点点
还行 可能我看多了真人化的电影 并且只看了几集动画 所以对魔改啥的并不知情 倒也没觉得尴尬奇怪啥的
自尊心过高≈死鸭子嘴硬，这么拍估计能拍个100集🤣🤣但就是离谱的好笑😂最后那个校庆表白满天飞舞的气球有惊艳到！超好看！🥰🥰结局也确实没想到，这两个人为什么无时无刻脑子不是在想怎么压过对方一头🤭
他两其实真的蛮有cp感 别把我磕死 梗太多了吧我说 sho在那里唱辛迪瑞拉 还有kanna的京子 笑死 最后的心形气球磕死 结局真的烂很好呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜
人性一闪念。
比第一部好多了，最后的奉心祭气球场景好看！
韩寒还是韩寒的风格，如果是小说，好过作品。
人摆脱不了自己的宿命。底层出现过，又未留下丝毫痕迹。厌水死于水，厌火焚于火。年少的单纯要面对的是各种复杂的黑暗
冲着拉子看的，果然没失望，剧情比较平淡，或者说那一段历史就是平静水面下的暗朝汹涌，鱼儿不知道发生了什么只能随波逐流，可能下一秒就被暗流带着摔死在石头上……
第一部：辉夜大小姐想让我告白；第二部：辉夜大小姐自己也想告白。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
