Future of Food In the past year, we have seen food riots on three continents, food inflation has rocketed and experts predict that by 2050, if things don't change, we will see mass starvation across the world. This film sees George Alagiah travel the world in search of solutions to the growing global food crisis. From the two women working to make their Yorkshire market town self-sufficient to the academic who claims it could be better for the environment to ship in lamb from New Zealand, George Alagiah meets the people who believe they know how we should feed the world as demand doubles by the middle of the century.
【India】
George joins a Masai chief among the skeletons of hundreds of cattle he has lost to climate change and the English farmer who tells him why food production in the UK is also hit. He spends a day eating with a family in Cuba to find out how a future oil shock could lead to dramatic adjustments to diets. He visits the breadbasket of India to meet the farmer who now struggles to irrigate his land as water tables drop, and finds out why obesity is spiralling out of control in Mexico.
Back in Britain, George investigates what is wrong with people's diets, and discovers that the UK imports an average of 3000 litres of water per capita every day. He talks to top nutritionist Susan Jebb, DEFRA minister Hilary Benn and Nobel laureate Rajendra Pachauri to uncover what the future holds for our food.
【Senegal】
George heads out to India to discover how a changing diet in the developing world is putting pressure on the world's limited food resources. He finds out how using crops to produce fuel is impacting on food supplies across the continents. George then meets a farmer in Kent, who is struggling to sell his fruit at a profit, and a British farmer in Kenya who is shipping out tonnes of vegetables for our supermarket shelves. He also examines why so many people are still dying of hunger after decades of food aid.
Back in the UK, George challenges the decision-makers with the facts he has uncovered - from Oxfam head of research Duncan Green to Sainsbury's boss Justin King. He finds out why British beef may offer a model for future meat production and how our appetite for fish is stripping the world's seas bare.
【Cuba】
In the final episode George Alagiah heads out to Havana to find out how they are growing half of their fruit and vegetables right in the heart of the city, investigates the 'land-grabs' trend - where rich countries lease or buy up the land used by poor farmers in Africa - and meets the Indian agriculturalists who have almost trebled their yields over the course of a decade.
George finds out how we in this country are using cutting-edge science to extend the seasons recycle our food waste and even grow lettuce in fish tanks to guarantee the food on our plates.
He hears the arguments about genetically modified food and examines even more futuristic schemes to get the food on to our plates.
比如躲在暗处的那个美国兵，也算是有重要戏份的角色，或许是我脸盲看漏了，也算是个影响了几次作战的强力配角，可他好像就是突然出现并没有什么前情伏笔？
战斗中终于有了点战术的影子，伍千里牺牲时配乐的钢琴曲和片尾孙楠的歌太破坏情境了。
一个导演画风统一多了 倒叙的方式也很徐克 只不过两个小时的高潮后劲特别疲惫 炸桥找了个寂寞有些寒凉 平河炸坦克那个画面应该能留存很久
两个破防的泪点：一个是万里说“百里是我哥，你也是我哥，七连都是我哥。”一个是最后七连全员牺牲，只剩万里一个人报到：“第七穿插连应到157人，实到1人”。致敬先烈。
第七穿插连应到一百五十七人，实到一人。 《长津湖之水门桥》一部让人泪目的影片。 炮架子打断了，战士的肉身可以做炮架子。 水门桥作战的惨烈超出了上一部的长津湖。 为了当今的太平盛世，先烈们付出了太多。
进入水门桥正题前太无聊，重复的场面➕抒情，入不了戏。水门桥正题开始斗智斗勇很紧张刺激。几段牺牲都没有打动我，但朱亚文角色的牺牲让我动容了。
和上一部相比剧情更加简单，情节更加连贯，战争也更加悲壮……
只能说有些情节有点夸张了，为什么伍千里被烧死，而伍万里毫发无损半天才活过来……
如同吃包子，第一个好吃，第二个一般。第一部、落后就要挨打，电影更注重群像，所以没有过多细节描写，观众感情大于理性的；第二部，看多了，个人感情可以收敛，所以对电影评价客观，个人描写突出，战争部分场面不合理（我猜的），观影感一般，加上对影院制裁的新闻，好感度一般； 最后，不需要电影，我也热爱我的国。
使命、荣誉和坚毅让他们战斗到最后！致敬向死而生的英雄！
那这部电影就做好了，你无可否认。。。
7.0，不如第一部，可以明显看出本来要放第一部分内容没放下所以有了水门桥，文戏太少，一直爆炸审美疲劳，看得出来徐克给画面带来的功劳，质感美感很不错，李晨牺牲拍的让人动容。希望展现先辈的电影都能越拍越好，让人触动铭记历史。
感动震撼，不可磨灭的意志。被七连伍万里最后报数：“第七连穿插应到一百五十七人，实到一人”这句话整得涕泪横流
2011.11.11 居然还有下一部吗 蹲一个 2022.2.20 第22.2万人看过 在1090看的 伍万里的成长线真让人心疼 一开始大家都在 一开始大家都意气风发 到最后全员be了 “七连应到157人，实到1人！”
却即使去死也未必保护周全的感觉
这不是主旋律电影的进步，是影视行业在前十年得了“小时代”的病之后的康复阶段。前面塑造空洞，以至于后面几个大老爷的大吼大叫，及格线边缘的视觉水平却不如2009年《风声》的平静收尾台词来的震撼。
没看1直接来看2了，有一些场面拍的还挺有趣，但是整体故事性就不太行……
这不是主旋律电影的进步，是影视行业在前十年得了“小时代”的病之后的康复阶段。前面塑造空洞，以至于后面几个大老爷的大吼大叫，及格线边缘的视觉水平却不如2009年《风声》的平静收尾台词来的震撼。
任何成功或失败的战役都是有意义的。
6/10。徐克将悲情美学和霹雳迅猛的动作场景，在一次次桥毁墩塌的巨大震响和粉碎性爆射中推向情绪的彻底释放。志愿军声东击西、擒贼擒王，打掉探照灯、炸掉弹药堆、突入水泵房、高速滑雪山、冲进坦克底，他们的骨肉被坦克碾碎，为保全集体扑向手雷、吸引敌机密集的枪弹，吞没于大片燃烧弹制造的火海，最后万里抱着哥哥遗体滚下烧化的雪流，以惨重牺牲来扭转战局，美国人则是以逸待劳、兵来将挡，出动成批浩荡疾驰的坦克、遮天蔽日的轰炸机、从天而降的钢桥梁，压迫着幸存的志愿军，整个战局布满谋划、应变，颇有武侠小说风味。不过历史呈现上仍有迎合的趋向，数百名志愿军进攻炸桥却无力阻挡美军安全撤退的真实情况，被缩减成小分队虽败犹荣的壮举，并拍摄了敌舰仓皇逃离的岸边被志愿军高举枪支淹没、红围巾迎风飘扬的胜利场面，以弥补歼敌未成的挫败感。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
