Lois Ames is devoted to her job as the editor of a magazine, and her wealthy husband Fred is equally dedicated to polo and parties. Lois's long hours drive her secretary to quit, and she replaces her with Tom Sheridan, who happens to be in the office demonstrating a rowing machine. Tom likes the work and continues to advance until he is indispensable to Lois. Ruth Holman, Tom's fiancée, is jealous of Tom's relationship with Lois and with some reason, as he is falling in love with her. In the meantime, Fred is having an affair with Ann Le Maire, a woman whose interests are closer to his own. Because he feels his love for Lois is hopeless, Tom quits his job and plans his marriage to Ruth. Lois tries to patch things up with Fred, but he suggests that they divorce instead. On Tom's last night, Lois keeps him working late. Ruth is furious and storms up to the office where Lois and Tom are dining. She threatens to tell Lois's husband about their relationship, which leaves the way clear for Lois to announce her pending divorce. Ruth breaks off her engagement to Tom, and he immediately asks Lois to marry him.
回顾起来 Abbie要比Tom格局大得多
网飞牛逼。
铭记一句话，解释了美国官僚政府理应被民众认清的地位：
the whole world is watching
都这个年代了，还在用这种方式洗脑呢。。全篇无聊至极，毫无触动，还是民主党老一套，内容零散，并没有一个完整的叙事。。其实也写不出完整的叙事。。因为这种斗争本来就是割裂的
“果蝇的一辈子，周末愉快。”
但尼克松连任说明了美国当时的真实情况
When the people shall grow weary of their constitutional right to amend their government, they shall exert their revolutionary right to dismember and overthrow that government. 历史往复
用电影渲染的形式代替纪录片还原历史事件的确是十分叫座也讨巧的手艺，最后一幕念名单的时候倒不见法警上前制止。一场审判杂糅着社会底层的自我正视、白人阶层的种族歧视，美国宪法或者说各国披着法律外衣的zzhi此刻又忘记了建立联邦zf的初衷
剧本和剪辑确实漂亮。通过庭审过程中的不断闪回，逐步勾勒了和平抗议如何变成了暴力冲突，没有浪费笔墨在还原冲突本身上。
are we allowed to talk about it?
法官大概是被告派的卧底，帮助被告塑造受害者形象
依然是密集的对白，超多信息量，关键是把故事还讲得挺精彩就很牛皮了。不过故事本身就很不错～
不顶不是美国人！THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING!
犀利的文本无法掩盖镜头语言的贫乏，导致说教变得刻意而令人难受
最后一段过于煽，the whole world is watching 太好莱坞，不喜欢，中间几个时空穿插讲故事的方式还是不错的
美国的一些总统，一些议员，一些法官可能并非善茬，美国政府制定的外交政策也常常不符灯塔之名。但美国的宪政，民主，法治将会万古长青，美国的建国理念和国体原则将永垂不朽
Take nothing for granted.
喜欢小雀斑饰演的汤姆海登这个角色，有克制，有理智，有热血，有情义。
当然，政治官司暗藏了许多猫腻，不仅仅是美国的陪审团制度就能左右，1960年代的反越游行，夹杂了美国底层阶级各色各样的人物表演。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
