剧情介绍

  A quick glimpse at the cast for this film would make any horror fan giddy with glee. The actual movie doesn't live up to those high expectations, but it's far from being all bad. Desi Arnaz Jr. (!) plays an author who makes a crazy $20,000 bet with his publisher that he could write a great novel in only 24 hours. To do so, the publisher gives him the keys to an old abandoned house where he won't be disturbed. Not true. Once he gets there he is interrupted by a multitude of guests including a family which consists of John Carradine, Sheila Keith, Peter Cushing and Vincent Price. They are gathered there in a twisted family reunion to release their brother from the room he's been imprisoned in for forty years. Even Christopher Lee drops by as Corrigan, the man who has just purchased the house. Soon, they realize that the caged brother is loose and out for revenge.
  What a great plotline and what a dream cast! This movie should have been a hell of a lot better. It's hard to pinpoint the exact problems with the film, but I would venture to say that the lack of lighting was a major fault. Sure the house has no electricity but I think they took the title of the movie a little too literally. Scenes after scenes are barely visible and the actors' faces are undecipherable. Only the moments in the main dinning hall are well lit. Also, the great actors are given very little to do. Cushing gets a few chuckles as the scared brother but Price, Lee and especially Carradine are somewhat wasted here. Well, at least Price gets the best line of the film: `Please don't interrupt me while I am soliloquizing.' And on the plus side, the story has enough twists and turns throughout to keep one`s interest and the ending, while a bit of a cop-out, manages to surprise.

评论:

  • 子强 1小时前 :

    情感上四星,致敬,毕竟人家能拍出来,在呐喊,即便你知道那光明的结局遥不可及。

  • 卓鸿 4小时前 :

    作为女性太能理解这样的电影的意义(但电影真的拖沓的让人难以忍受了,印度电影特有的那种镜头和剪辑还有配乐真的好烦)片尾最后的三行字真的让人不寒而栗。这就是女性的现实,就像女主对他的律师男友常说的那句话何尝不是说给自己的呢?such a drama queen…但是不用如此极端的方式没有人会听到她的诉求,这就是现实!女性的现实!太草了…看完电影一看时间今天也是一个星期四…fxxk the society

  • 卫一泓 6小时前 :

    就冲阿三拍出这样的电影,尼玛到了最后再给你惊几下。步步升华,伦理上完美。

  • 多晨曦 0小时前 :

    接这个电影,桑德拉布洛克就是奔着表演奖去的。里面那个黑人警察说得挺好,你要活在当下,不能活在20年前。里面有问题的人,都是活在过去的缘故。但是,又哪能这么容易走出来啊。

  • 巧春梅 8小时前 :

    刚开始挺好,但是一跟总理通话后,开始崩了,这就有点脱离现实了

  • 施和蔼 1小时前 :

    印度电影里较为常见的题材,以暴制暴的核心!

  • 婷琛 0小时前 :

    当强奸似乎成为老生常谈但却好像无药可解,当女性被迫要用一种骇人的方式才能引起人们严肃的注意力,这真是社会的悲哀。

  • 卫昊 9小时前 :

    虽然但是 就真的完全想到了《三年A班》啊 艺术创作真的太好用别人的创意了 😭

  • 卫斌 3小时前 :

    尤其是结尾那个反转,着实意想不到

  • 平楷 3小时前 :

    不希望每一次的进步,都伴随着流血和牺牲,有些东西,可以从一开始就做的很好……当一个诉求被长久忽视,它不会消失,而只会以更汹涌的姿态,卷土重来!

  • 帆林 4小时前 :

    (霰弹枪口径最大可以达到26.72毫米,但最常见的口径是18.53毫米和15.63毫米;弹丸通常为铅制)

  • 徐晓昕 8小时前 :

    Till it happens to you you won't know

  • 初洲 4小时前 :

    尽管有些地方挺假的,但起码有为不公平发声,起码可以拍这种题材。站出来,不要沉默。

  • 叔星纬 3小时前 :

    毫无逻辑,只讲氛围。ps这女主不就是陈凯琳印度分琳吗!

  • 仁霞雰 3小时前 :

    还可以吧,但火候欠佳。说不上来,哪儿块有点不得劲儿

  • 家泽 2小时前 :

    《星期四》就像是个犯罪片万能模板,最后的核心立意贴任何现实问题都可以成立。归根到底就是悬疑的铺垫,犯罪本身与正义诉求没有必然性,也没有主人公逐步发掘真相的戏剧反转。全盘在理想化的女主视角下平铺直叙,顺利发展。因此那些视听语言所建立起的紧张氛围都是伪惊悚。而且在视听处理上也有印度电影一贯的毛病。虽然近年像韩国电影在像现实主义题材转,但创作喜欢还是脱离不了歌舞片的那种推焦大特写,这就是落后审美的局限性。

  • 函巍然 2小时前 :

    韩国有熔炉法案 今后印度会不会有星期四法案

  • 寒璐 8小时前 :

    立意还行但是女主演技太差,剧情也不丝滑,浪费我时间

  • 弥问凝 8小时前 :

    印度不仅仅是因为qj,更多的是种族制度,宗教信仰让人分三六九等,相比于资本势力,这种种族烙印封建残余更应该被铲除,否则这种奴役歧视和悲剧会一直存在。

  • 云高驰 1小时前 :

    深深的悬念,漂亮的女主,跌宕的剧情,持久的观感,好片该有的本片都有了,除了印度式歌舞。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved