Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
My dear, best friend.
好像陈妍希，李芯悦爱死wing了，但现实让她不愿意再赌一次试试看。wing一直是后反劲儿但够持久的那一个，长大了为了爱换专业。
从失踪之后就不行了，开始混乱。
肯定是爱情啊。年轻时的爱恋 真的美好过就足够了，没有那么多幸运能爱着爱着就永远。
虽然只有三星，但推荐观看。优点是情节细腻，雨中吻虽然中二，但是感人。缺点是动机铺陈不够，后半段略生硬，两位女演员演技也有点生涩。
她说“是一个特别的朋友”有多特别呢 我想她也不清楚吧……
有点含糊不清的感觉，好像故事没有讲明白，不过，好爱谈善言～（改分了，看了三遍，后劲有点大……）
我收回 成长还是自己逼迫自己成长了女主，但是情感沟通始终还是没明白一厢情愿和两个一厢情愿的关联
仅剩的两星全给谈善言，打再多柔光都抵不住剧情拉胯。李芯悦连做朋友都不值得，最后嫁了没露脸的路虎大哥。
我的右手边坐着一对异性恋，电影过半起，女生一直哭，哭到了全剧终。男生一言不发，起身就走了。
某些片段可以，但是结局我真的不理解 骗我眼泪。
不能接受后面的结局，既然都这么爱了还结什么婚
通过两位少女的成长历程，细腻刻画两人之间的友情与爱情。电影充斥着清新气息的氛围，配合剧情的推进道出一段段动人的故事。虽然本片以两位主角彼此的相互喜欢故事为主线，但电影的主旨是成长，二人经历着友情与爱情，互相留下刻在心底的触动。最后BE的结局可谓是意料之中，有几组镜头还是很有韵味的。片中揉合了青春、爱情、友情、亲情等多种元素，对情感的探讨也很丰富。不过整体剧情有些过于狗血，全片的柔光滤镜滥用，配乐和旁白也是减分项，且两位女主十几岁学生的扮相违和感过强。整体尚可，可以一看，片中还有对《蓝宇》的致敬。
咱就是说看了这么多同题材的电影就没见过这么做作离谱瞎搞浪费感情的电影，无语，想看的朋友还是别看了，我看完就是摊手黑人小哥
有点一言难尽……我能理解两个女主高中时期的状态，结局是理解不了。
如果李咏蓝在李芯悦痛哭的时候只是安静地抱着她
凌晨12点微熏熏回家，电影天堂更新前三，最喜欢跳舞翘脚脚的情节了。嗯，看完洗了睡
喜欢你是你，可她不是你的你了，喜欢你是你，可她有可能成为那个你了。你都不管，你都不要，过不去了，无条件投降。
我觉得拍的很好啊，为什么分数这么低。情感推动情节真的很好，有时候女孩子之间的感情真的很复杂，不是用爱情或是友情简简单单就可以概括的。喜欢看百合也是因为这个吧，干干净净又纯粹动人。谁的一生没有勇敢爱过一个不可能的人呢，结局重要吗。不重要。因为曾经总想要一个故事结尾，但真正等到很多年后，会发觉也许什么都没那么重要了，回忆会美化很多很多相遇和离别，故事中的我们永远不会谢幕。
怎么还在拍校园故事啊啊啊！看到开头心里就咯噔一下，又是结婚当伴娘的drama！ 所以呢？就“我们永远是最好的朋友”？我只能说，远离直女，会变得不幸。p.s. 快二十年过去了，反而越来越倒退，《蝴蝶》里还有离婚和小叶一起的结局，这里就结婚当伴娘？！去他的好朋友，就那么缺朋友哦，躲在朋友的名义下享受着爱人的爱意可真行。以及，这一对的沟通看得头疼，全靠猜，都想给对方自己以为的好。双方对于自己的取向探索和认同几乎没拍出来，槽点太多，一言难尽。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
