Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
摔倒并不可怕 可怕的是再也不敢站起来
国产动画中鲜有的少年向作品，虽然技术上有所欠缺，但是剧情节奏非常规整，并且可以感受到创作者们对篮球、对电影的热爱与尊重。
【5000多集了吧】
明天我会再告诉你！”
可以说有震撼到，有几幕真的是太让人触动了。是到目前为止，今年最喜欢的电影。
好看！！就是人物比《筐出未来》里比例更接近人，一开始看不太习惯，其他都还好～希望还能继续看到喜羊羊与灰太狼大电影。评分偏低大概是因为春节档上映，那时候又没啥能看的电影，吸引了一些非受众群体，不习惯看子贡向动画……个人觉得作为子贡向已经做得很好了。
带着孩子走进电影院才惊觉，我和对象认识于上一个虎年。那一天我被豆友叫到特殊学校做义工，他带着设备去给孩子们放喜羊羊的虎虎生威。（那是第一次见面。后来才经另一个朋友正式介绍认识。）那一年灰太狼还冲进羊村要吃羊，这一年都和羊组队打篮球了。
我不懂篮球啦，就是看个热闹，可是真的蛮好哭的诶😭😭😭
5.0/10。全方位的落后于时代，对篮球的理解也仅仅停留在玩梗和经典场面复刻。技战术和人物模板的设计甚至还不如《黑子的篮球》。
这个落差是谁都无法接受的
总之，现在的喜羊羊比前几年强了不少，但也再难及《羊羊运动会》《古古怪界》巅峰，狼吃不吃羊很重要，但也不是绝对的核心。而我也终于长大了，不必重温旧梦。
向着未来，勇往直前 2022.1.22点映
这不是我童年的喜羊羊，味道变了，顶多算同人作品
虽然是老套路，但情怀还是燃起来，这个系列其实一直都在表现，成年人的世界真不容易啊。
热血漫就是最强的！虽然知道要演什么，但是演出了就是很厉害，构图运镜都很厉害，人物（动物？）让我一个颜狗很满意，虽然也有说教鸡汤的内容，但是他的运镜，他的构图表现力完全可以弥补这些。
我真觉得不错，看的很过瘾。确实是有一点《灌篮高手》的影子。在商业动画大电影上这个套路还是很得人心的。有人说这是子供向的，我觉得不是。除了主角是动物和喜羊羊与灰太狼这个IP，这其实是少年向的燃。
韩剧在煽情这块做得很好了，从剧本故事线到演员对角色的拿捏，能让你想到身边的人或事。
我们认识多久了？
其实还是挺套路的适合比较低龄多小朋友2.5分把 里面能看出灌篮高手的影子 还有励志剧规规整整的套路 不出彩 画风实在爱不起来
从人人都笑灰太狼 现在人人都是灰太狼
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
