Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
没看过舞台剧的基础上，比想象中好很多，包括原来最担心的节奏问题，Evan的故事线和道德困境讲的还挺完整（这不吊打去年的舞会），AA和摩尔真是近期合作了两部的烂片姐妹会，但这两部“烂片”（另一部是窗边的女人）我都觉得挺好。Ben的年龄还是大了，有几场戏他边哭边唱但神情和口型又像在说台词有点违和感。
总而言之工工整整情感丰沛
尽管不满意，却还是被骗到泪水，要想和这个故事不共鸣太难了
主题很好，自省精神可贵，玩忽职守就是杀害那些吃不上饭的人。
3.5 有这钱学隔壁CFA出个OBC官摄，这不香嘛？PS我永远对音乐剧改编电影后新加的歌毫无感觉。
虽然表情是犯罪 但其实更多的是讲震后创伤和社会福利的问题 两者之间的天平跟倾向于后者 没有过多的悬念 节奏也不是很好 特别是后面有一部分 导演感觉抓重点也抓的不足 主演们挺好
现实向这一面拍得还行，就是不够紧凑，有点拖
题材好社会性强是因为原著好，和导演拍得差不矛盾
上映前：唯一的遗憾是ben platt老了一点，个人感觉演高中生缺了一点说服力。看完后：我的担心成真了。三十岁的ben不适合这个角色，甚至感觉他的声音状态也不如以前。当然这个片子的问题远远不止这些，所有角色里面只有evan的妈妈能让人共情，evan不是很讨喜，其它角色则基本都是边缘化功能化了。3星不能更多。
the story is complete, it's a pity that the suspense is illogical, there is no tips about the darkness of Kaya Kiyohara, the detective is also unprofessional, the story showed the poor people how to live, the darkness of the society is not exposed enough, the surrounding affects people invisible
这部电影在小范围预映阶段就被音乐剧粉骂得不行不行的了，据说是因为著名制作人Marc Platt (主演Ben的爸爸) 早就买下了版权所以Ben才理所当然地在银幕上继续演Evan，27岁的Ben嗓子一向没的说，但外形实在是像37，不知道网上传Ben生活中的人品就是男版的Lea Michele是不是真的~~
如果导演可以多讲一讲暗线的bipolar disorder就好了…
22.09.2021 | @ Regal Gallery Place | 有新歌！！Julianne Moore会唱歌！但是这个导演是智障吗？！！！！
在疫情下看到了这部电影。少数人抗灾能力低下，在灾难下成为了牺牲品。社会资源有限，社会资源调动不足，导致了少部分的牺牲者。孕育出了一些极端情绪，最后只有精神上的自我救赎。很糟糕的现状，人类依然在自然/灾难面前是如此渺小。感慨/同情，然后依然重复过上每一天。
犯人其实看到一半就一目了然了，动机电影里最早就提出来了，仇杀，没有任何反转。
整个表现手法真的很不适合，没有在恰当的时候有恰当的表现…而且Ben应该放弃这次演出的，把机会让给适合的有才华的小男生不也挺好的吗？
是一部抨击社保政策的电影，大体上就是一个特别简单的故事，纯靠一个情节推动，而且人和人的关系明显可以表现的更多层次，更内敛，不推荐观看。
近乎于令人生气，啥玩意。希望出官摄，这种改编的水平拉低了DEH原本的好，该被钉在耻辱柱上。
真正需要低保救济金的人的死活，骗保这笔钱的人毫不关心，发放这笔钱的人不够关心。
剧本好歌好我觉得跟电影确实没有什么关系，归功于原作。演员也演的唱的蛮好的。看起来还是很感动。我还没看剧，单就片子来讲我最大的问题可能是觉得光/摄影不是很好看，斯坦尼康用的真是水，互联网那段设计也有点傻。其他没啥。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
