6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful.
A brilliant and outragously funny satire of society, 7 December 1999
Author: Dave Joerg ([email protected])
"Flodder" is one of the funniest movies ever made and few people realise that it is a Dutch movie made by none other than the Holland version of John Carpenter, the famous Dick Maas, author and director of the thriller "Amsterdamned". The Flodder family is the reincarnation of the term a-social. When the whole family bunch, basically all bastards, criminals and sluts must be relocated from their City slum because of toxic waste under their house, the city council house no choice. The only available space is in the "Zoendal" - the "Sun Valley" the best area in Amsterdam where all doctors, snobs and businessmen can afford to live their lives. And where the central point of interest and politics is the tennis club of the community. The Flodder family brings devastation to the tranquil world that ruled before. They are simply unbelievable. The characterisation is incredibly funny, beginning with Ma Flodder who searches other people's trash cans for food or making illegal liquor in her cellar and ending with the eldest daughter who is the biggest slut on earth. Together they make the most horrible family imaginable, a sort of immoral mirror image to the Brady Bunch or the Waltons. When the City counsel of Amsterdam hoped that the Flodders would show their good will to be more civilised in their new area, it turns out that Holland's most famous family would rather bring out the worst in the rich people of "Sun Valley"-wonderland. The rest is a hilarious, brilliant and well made social satire that can be watched as a provocative movie as well as a straightforward comedy. Dick Maas at his best. I salute him! Flooder was the Dutch smash hit in 1986 and brought two sequels and a tv series. All of the sequels were nice but not as great as the original.
Flodders (1986) is available on DVD in Germany in a dubbed German version in Dolby Digital 5.1. under the name:
"Flodders -Eine Familie zum knutschen"
Why is First Floor Features, the producer of the movie not bringing the Dick Maas blockbusters out on DVD in the Netherlands, I wonder. The are not even available on video there. These movies have so much potential, still to this day and have a huge silent but true following.
2.突兀的希望结尾
Anne Boleyn and dying pheasants
#It's not just me who loves you ! ——♡Maggie#
困兽之斗，克里斯汀·斯图尔特的表演很棒。王室的刻板传统和婚姻的不幸让她喘不过气来，最后的驾车飞驰逃离禁锢很解压了。
一开始总觉得在看王冠的加长版，但电影的视角集中在黛安娜一人身上，其他所有皇亲贵胄都像是腐朽的阴影，他们企图将黛安娜也拉进这个坟墓，而她却从亡魂中获得了救赎，从咽下珍珠到扯碎项链，从穿上节日标签到换上父亲的夹克，她选择站在枪口前，选择站在残酷和冰冷对面。克莉丝汀的演技仿佛被黛安娜的灵魂附身，再加上影片里安妮博林从历史中穿越而来的灵魂，她们鬼魅的身影似乎可以打破一切，包括你面前的屏幕，于是只是想说，don’t go gentle into the night
其实我感觉就是借了戴安娜的壳，用了那种反叛与传统的矛盾感，讲的像是黑天鹅里的故事，自残，自杀，臆想，把一个人演到极致，片子很惊悚，但是真的好美，不过那些直白的对比，时刻都在强调的tradition，还有那个结尾实在不太好，不像是传记电影了。
怼脸，耸耸肩膀，左右转头，露侧脸，反复如斯，我像是在看她为Chanel高定拍广告拍封面而不是拍电影。
就像马思纯演的《第一炉香》，剧本不对累死演员
比Jackie还要糟糕得多，大量的怼脸特写，除了全方位无死角展现小K的美貌之外，几乎所有的微表情都还是典型的K式神经质。熟悉小K的人表示，这里她根本没有不像她，她走路的姿势她的体态她局促的样子，都完完全全是她自己。把复杂的历史人物传记拍成了简单的心理惊悚片，而且是一个极其有限的切片（又是在延续Jackie的模式）这种神经质显然无法引起观者对于Diana的同情。她的境遇何种糟糕，观众不能进入，因为她先在地成为了一个惊恐的女人。而最后的结局也几乎是无力的，如果做回Spencer就意味着这些。中间穿插的那一段拿出去直接可以做高定广告的剪辑，实在让我无从理解……
倒觉得不必拿来和《第一夫人》作比。Jackie的动力来自幕与幕之间流转的讲述的动力，这种不顾剪辑时序和影像“真伪”的讲述不断地将观众推远，并将自身呈示为一尊宛如Citizen Kane般的形象，历史的形象。她最后甚至在“批改”记者的笔记，谁能说电影就不是被“批改”的结果呢。《斯宾塞》则在大量按部就班的推轨中抻长对历史的厌倦，以至于要将扮演Spencer的KS兜一大圈再还原成KS，它宣称历史是“需要”被扮演的——却是为了更好地返回现在。是自洽的但……这有什么表达的意义和必要吗？一种死去的电影，用角色的话说就挺currency的吧。
且不说王冠珠玉在前，并不是每个观众都熟读并背诵英国皇家那些事儿的好吗？上来就指望观众共情是不是太贪心了/色调好舒服
片子刚选完角的时候，大家都一众质疑。片子上了，又看到了好多夸奖。抱着怀疑好奇的心态去看，感觉能get导演要的风格，但是就感觉整部片子哪儿哪儿都很拧巴……
一出独角戏。Kk演技进步惊人，配乐很阴间。不是提前知道剧情，分分钟以为自己在看《闪灵》
起码妆造上很贴，小K好美，大部分时间演得不错已经有进步很多了毕竟很多都是怼脸拍的，但海边的戏的和结尾又回到她自己了。情绪浓度很高，配乐的调度也挺好，和查尔斯掰头那段挺喜欢的又总觉得少了点什么，但加了那段姬情戏真的好败笔
“这里没有未来，过去就是现在”让反叛的斯宾塞处于晃动的手持下，一旦被皇室身份压抑，立马变为工整镜头下的黛安娜王妃的焦躁不安，不断重复又不断积攒，成为古宅中历史的幽灵，在“变装蒙太奇”后撕掉衣服与珠宝的枷锁，笼中金丝雀如愿成为野鸡，那就难逃悲剧的发生。囧尼配乐和克莱尔的胶片摄影疯狂加分，奥斯卡冲起来，暮光之城这对儿发展越来越好了
小k拿影后！（不管怎么样，KFC和羽绒服已经赢了
小K唯一一部演技颜值同时在线的电影，一开始还会觉得她矫揉造作的姿态未免太端着了，后面反倒觉得这是一个被压抑至极不得不端庄，又有些病态的女人。但是电影实在太过于从屌丝窥探贵族的角度了，完全就是从八卦杂志上面剪切了一些新闻做成的文本，一点也不清楚本片的意义在哪，而最后的收尾简直收得我“老人地铁手机”。唯一的亮点是王妃与幻觉交错的那几个镜头剪辑，以及郭敬明只有在梦里才能拍出来的高贵大气的服装秀。
Kristen Stewart时装秀，香奈儿成最大赢家。
小视角固然是一种选择，然而导致了片中所有角色的极度扁平，即便是戴安娜。戴妃的困境绝不全然来自家庭的规训、婚姻的不幸；她自有她身为王妃的矛盾，她的悲哀，却也绝不该是安妮·博琳式的宫闱稗史。而拉雷恩则几乎将戴安娜视作一个可悲的、极度缺爱的精神病患者，一个一心追求自由内心空虚的怨妇：她脆弱不堪如同易碎的花瓶，她不断堕入幻觉不断地歇斯底里，她的反叛不过是换装、跳舞、在海滩上狂奔，她一面关心儿子们的安危、一面带着儿子们作无视前路的危险的飙车。可是，戴安娜竟然是这样的人吗？那么无数对准她的摄像头又是在捕捉些什么呢？只是要偷拍她换衣服吗？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
