Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
三老也没说要复仇啊，至少凶手也没被折磨得不成人形？
把好好的战争片拍成动作片，编排失重，加上年画般的景观渲染、电视剧级别的套路和群演……整体实在无法令人满意。此外，伍万里这条线真的格外累赘突兀，浪费篇幅，充斥槽点，吃力不讨好。当他双手扔手榴弹的场景被慢放，电吉他🎸BGM响起的时候，俺整个人直接愣住……
张本煜全场综合最佳，是编剧的他很加分。至于演技，这里面我是真的欣赏不来的，你可以说是浮夸，但是我更愿意称之为差。喻恩泰一点都没有看出来是他。最后的照相馆老板我看了一眼就觉得特别的眼熟，居然是伟同啊！
伟大的中国人民志愿军万岁！！
清一色都是抗日神剧，也应该多拍拍抗美神剧了。打压打压漂亮韭菜嚣张的气焰。
虽然不是五星的电影，但五星送给抗美援朝的战士们，唯有感恩和尊敬
3.5星，这部电影的本质如片末喻恩泰所说的，也许观众的解读比创作者更高明。
寸土寸血的主题，满满当当的战斗，偶一细腻的情感，互不兼容的败笔。
原本想打两星的，越想越气愤，这玩意能叫电影吗？好不容易从学校逃出来看场电影，花四十大洋，让本就不富裕的孩子生活雪上加霜，就给我看这个！
不太明白为什么都说是剧本杀电影，其实是有点误导性的，剧本杀的内容体量要大得多，每个人物背后都应该有更深层次的动机和秘密，带着这种期待看本片怕是会失望的，因为这个剧本其实比较单薄，都是用制造小矛盾，甩“有深意”的台词，玩电影梗（现场观众对此反响冷淡）来填充，信息量不大。但也算是一个还可以的小成本电影吧。
剧情、演技、道具。。。都更像小屏幕、业余模仿者的水平，还达不到电影的水准。故事想要倡导的道义难能可贵，加一星。
沂蒙山小调一响，啥也别说了，作为一个临沂人，直接泪崩。😭😭
我们向世界再一次的证明，中国人才是最会讲故事的玩家~
终于看到了心心念念，期待已久的长津湖。无论场面，音效和特效都特别的棒，把抗美援朝这段波澜壮观的历史很好的呈现在观众面前。“没有冻不死的英雄，也没有打不死的英雄，有的只是军人的荣耀”，“如果我们不打这一仗，我们的下一代就要打，我希望我们的下一代能生活在一个没有硝烟的世界”，一句句台词震撼人心，引起共鸣。感谢前人的牺牲付出，才换来没有硝烟的和平年代。
寰映影院｜跌宕起伏好喜欢，上海阿叔太有梗了啊喂。致敬很多电影——闪灵、无间道、英雄本色等等等。全程笑点，节奏很棒诶，一场能让你从头笑到尾的电影还要什么锤子啊。
累了…失望…一星送给抗美援朝的战士，一星送给剧组全员的付出。顺便补充，号称流浪地球之后的第二个牛逼的长镜头真没Get到哪里牛逼了…感觉像是镜头时间没留够，特效做上去时间不够长，然后24帧强行升格导致的廉价的抽帧…长镜头内给每个人甩的特写节奏也很奇怪…
兰晓龙没让人失望！此片是中国电影工业的一大进步，三位导演，各把自我风格发挥出来了，突出的是陈凯歌的诗意景象，江村渔火，万里长城，还有在火车内对人物性格的展现，颇有大师之风范；徐克的动作美学,林超贤的军事戏，做的也非常具有观赏性。此片的剧作也是主旋律电影的一大进步，宏观命题与微观情绪的并存，小人物团体为主角，真是把好莱坞的优点算是学过来了，这点兰晓龙功居其首。当然，影片也有很多不足之处（个人认为黄建新让兰晓龙做了妥协）：家国生存与个人生存融合地不好、志愿军精神以及战争残酷性表达地不充分；宏观戏过多，导致人物性格没立足；结尾处理太差；特效一般，音乐铺的过满，三个导演的风格不是很统一。
人物情感突如其来，没有任何铺垫的悲伤真的很难让人入戏。
三星半。算是那种有佳句无佳章的类型，整体节奏掌控、角色设定都显得比较稚嫩。前半部分看得比较煎熬，参差不齐的演技和话剧式拉垮。不过后半部分渐入佳境了，结构上、诡计上作者还是有一些精巧设计在里面。
——“知道这个世界上什么最可怕吗？”——“记忆。”
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
