Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
虽然总有着一股油腻感，以及一贯的输出靠吼的情感表达方式来弥补表演和剧本的功力不足，但我终于在国产青春片里感受到了年轻和热血
在大环境下，这样的作品难能可贵，最起码，我们还拥有追梦的权利。
借着热血青春的名义拍的这么俗气拉胯，是这么多人都没看过优秀的青春片吗？？确实看着是挺青春的，也挺有活力，但是所谓的热血我觉得挺狗血的。而且传统中国大陆式青春片的盲目自嗨，真的让人嗨不起来，本来开头看着还可以的，后续越来越不行，乱七八糟，为了热闹而瞎热闹。不是拍了点夏天的阳光、大海、少年就是青春片了，讲故事手法能不能别再这么俗，这么不符合实际了？！自嗨无前途！
强烈推荐各位国庆带着小伙伴一起去体验一下真正的中国新式青春燃片٩( 'ω' )و
在国产青春片普遍脑残智障的大环境下，给个五星鼓励鼓励～
6.5/10.
好討巧的選題，性別角色的良性錯置與男子氣概的建構反思，以一種極為溫和的方式放在簡中語境中，男性少年的身體成為被凝視的對象，可喜的是，他們的成長，既不必（至少是主要）依靠外力，也不怵於示弱認慫，這一點對今天的雞娃世界而言太難得了，然而他們的破繭，還得仰仗網絡流量。夏天，結束了，撲水，還繼續！
非常惊喜！国产青春片中少有的非常正能量的作品，观影时感觉时间过得很快看完心情很好的类型。男孩子们都像是本色出演，很可爱很自然，而且没有卖腐。笑点能做到全场大笑，泪点也不刻意煽情。除了队长其他人的人物弧光不够丰满有些可惜，但是主旨表达也很清晰合理了。非常值得一看！
「我们只被自己定义。」很优秀的一部青春励志片，真正燃野少年的泳池！每一个最普通的“张伟”，也能努力地“高飞”。清清爽爽的新人演员们带来了今年最舒舒服服的电影。超适合暑期档的电影，奈何被推上了十一档，实在是可惜。
如果我 注定普通 也要仰望 那片星空
质量很高，可惜了非要去挤国庆档，如果暑期档票房应该不错
7.1有诚意，改编的很好。海洋馆空翻那段拍的很美。就是最后多了十分钟。我为没有去电影院看而道歉。
儿子学游泳，给他看看别人争取和坚持一件事的决心。翻牌
大多数人的青春里没有过多的爱恨情仇，有的也就是为了一件件微不足道的小事而去努力，想要的结果也就是把自己的努力完整呈现。
一起努力过的日子(五只花样跳水少年)。
另外最后，男主翻滚真的不用滚到天上去，太滑稽了。。。
真不错，比预期好很多。当然只是在青春片里做比较哈。真是自然清新不做作，最棒的是选角，五个少年都很自然，这但凡要是用一个流量的话就绝对不是这个样子。
其实拍得还不错，也不尴尬，本土化得挺好，唯一出戏的是不太像国内的高中，更像是大学。可能就是我不太吃青春片的风格的原因吧，看下来总觉得没啥共鸣。
虽然最后变成了军体拳，但青春真好。日版珠玉在前，但改编得难得不疼痛不矫揉不堕胎不撕逼，再小的光芒也会闪耀，青春真好。
清爽可爱，五个扑水少年选角挺好（高飞好帅🙈）。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
