The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
看一半时的我：导演这是全片磕了药吗，K最开始几句台词where am I我恨不得一棍子打上去…但越来越觉得…拍的有点好，特别是从想要在楼梯上自杀开始，就非常棒。但K的演技在这个角色总体上还有些矫揉造作
我觉得斯图尔特十分努力，但是跟我同去的美帝当地朋友也说有时完全听不懂她的英音，并且我们都觉得她演的太像没有两个孩子的大学女生了。
1. 起初没看出来是KS；
用《闪灵》拍传记片真新颖。虫尾巴老爷子瘦了好多。johnny greenwood这部或者犬之力一定能拿明年奥提
餐桌上的珍馐佳肴，那么精致，却没有烟火气；
神神化化一惊一乍，这不是黛安娜，像是某个俗套香奈鹅香水广告：女主惊慌，女主狂奔，女主找到香水喷上就悠然自得。
这部片的观感完全取决于你有多熟悉戴妃与你有多喜欢小kk，如果很熟悉戴妃且不喜欢小kk，这部片可以考虑pass，反之这部片必看，因为导演摄影太会抓小kk的颜了。这部电影其他奖我不好说，但妆发必须得有提名，小kk能看起来像戴妃，九成得感谢妆发老师们的努力，他们的妙手之下能让静止画面中的小kk有几分戴妃神韵，可惜小kk的仪态太差了，她只要一动，LA大妞就要从这层王妃皮里跳出来了，加上小kk真的不会演弱势的人，她的眼神太闪了，在大特写捕捉下，展现的不是柔或者弱，而是虚。所幸的是，这种不适集中在前半，如果忽视后期剧情降智，表演还可以。这部电影很有导演前作Jackie的感觉，但对戴妃的描写，我并不认可，那个时间点的戴妃已经不是影片想塑造的状态了，整个剧情更像是浓缩她这十年婚姻走过的心路历程，但做的太肤浅
看前猜想戴安娜王妃的故事无非是自由灵魂与繁文缛节、媒体与公众人物的辩证冲突这些老生常谈的议题 拉雷恩选择从纯主观视角、精神分析切入倒是让人耳目一新 本片题眼恰恰在于戴安娜和儿子们关于时态的对话——有过去、可能有现在、没有未来 这是皇室成员的宿命 躺在一眼望到头的装置内部而不自觉 精神已然僵朽 殊不知存在主义危机的迫近 而那些吊诡角度、手持大特写所聚焦的愁肠郁结、逡巡焦虑、精神癔症般交缠的幻觉与梦境 才是存在与时间的印痕 戴安娜借亘穿历史的化身不断介入与自己的关系 割破与周遭的关系 就像女仆与戴安娜镜前对话巧妙的画面 两人在左侧镜中促膝谈心 右侧镜中却相背而坐 幸而这并不是难以抹平的裂隙——爱与意义足矣
不得不说的是，与以往我见过的戴妃形象相比，比如美剧《王冠》，甚至是戴安娜本人出镜的纪录片，斯图尔特这一版的戴妃实在是太美艳了，而且不管和真实情况的吻合度有所少，她的桀骜不驯、顾影自怜都让人印象深刻。特别是影片中两次扯断珠链，既表明了挣脱王室华丽桎梏的抗争，也暗示了难以摆脱红颜薄命厄运的结局。
不如彻底一点，做成Mother!那样的惊悚片。/指匠情挑之后，Sally Hawkins又爱女人了，Hooray！
静态剧照看着还好，但Kristen一动起来和黛安娜本人相差得太远了，尤其是上半身的体态。台词口音也完全没有英国老贵感。另外和《第一夫人》一个问题，导演疯狂运用剪辑和配乐营造各种“演技时刻”。编剧强行把黛安娜的遭遇和安娜·博琳联系在一起，但这个类比毫无说服力。
用《闪灵》拍传记片真新颖。虫尾巴老爷子瘦了好多。johnny greenwood这部或者犬之力一定能拿明年奥提
2021.12.*宅男高材生和离职创业邻居的化敌为友，看着很不专业的感觉
克里斯汀斯图尔特确实看起来一直想吐的样子，演暮光女的时候也是。造型很像，衣服很好看，就还挺小时代的。
戴妃还真是Fine China，华美却易碎，渴望被呵护。
树立相当标杆的电视剧，糟糕的音乐剧还有不成功、却足以抓住视线的2013Naomi Watts版…相关的纪念与戏说从未停歇，并总能找到一个新的角度来“侵犯”与窥视。要把这样千篇一律的命题和故事拿来用，是个难关；然而这是已经有过《第一夫人》的Pablo Larraín，显然如此不同：关于Anne Boleyn的引用，那些从不掩饰的情绪以及卸下伪装后的释放…几番想象就全然将知道的进行推翻，重新试图感知站在风暴中心并是否思考其它的她。Kristen做得足够印象深刻，但不能移开的依然是在哪里都在发光的Sally Hawkins。
1. 起初没看出来是KS；
到仓库之前的剧情幼稚，台词尴尬，连打架斗殴都拍得很假，而且剧情抑得太过分了，让人膈应。仓库之后的剧情开始精彩纷呈，又回到了他们团队熟悉的解密风格，且剧情在线，还用上了之前的一些铺垫。感觉前面就是个两星片儿，后面值得四星，有点可惜，有点难受。
最难过的点是看到最后电影里的她终于开心地做回了Spencer，但照应在现实中她的生命已经开始了倒计时......厨房场景那么多但没看到一样比炸鸡更能勾起食欲的东西，不愧是你大英
3.5。有几处确实挺逗的，剧本稍显平庸，但秒杀那些低端国产网大还是很轻松的，包哥照样牛逼
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
