Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
当正义得不到伸张，唯有采取极端的手法。印度电影人又一现实主义题材电影，太敢拍了
Holy shit！印度现实主义是要向韩国现实主义宣战了嘛？
入坑是因为女主颜值 无论是温暖的阳光微笑 还是“黑化”后卡点bgm的眼神杀
不管怎么样结尾有一个案例被判死刑
它更像一部科幻片，女性主义科幻片，身为女性，我非常能理解受害女性的那种玉石俱焚、要严惩罪恶的心情，可是，在一个男权主导的现实世界里，女性想让强奸犯判死刑的诉求，是一种幻想。我更希望强奸犯能得到人道去势，毕竟控制不了下半身行为而违法犯罪的，就不该称之为人，而是动物。影片的剧情设计还是过于流于表面化了，所有人的表现都过于简单，这让整部电影的惊悚削弱，反而变得有点点可笑。
不明白为什么这部电影能大火！灾难性的表演，比较老套的设计，没有力量的结尾，一切都在意料之中情理之外。哎……
聚焦印度女性权益，整部电影还是比较普通，一惊一乍的bgm和突然的特写显得非常土，女主未婚夫的表演也很不合理，电影立意很有实际意义，但似乎力弱声微，还没有振聋发聩，因为印度的女性人权问题严重而复杂仅凭最后的两行字完全不够。
立意不错。印度的强奸案多到令人发指。当法律不能保护我们的时候，我们只能自己去伸张正义。心疼女主。7分
女主开枪打死强奸犯后无奈仰天叹气时，我差点没哭出来😭……
“情绪是一种资产，你从年纪增长里学会它“。想说的太多，又发现无话可说，因为该说的都被说过了，现状依旧让人无力。看到最后，我真的理解了她的悲伤。
非常努力地分次看到1:30,感觉后面肯定有包袱，但这部电影作为艺术品和工业品，显然都还差很大一点意思。
一个半小时后才知道发生什么，两个小时后才是真相，印度妇女太不容易了，要靠这种方式才能引起重视，悲哀。。。
当你开始看这部电影到现在，已经有8名妇女被强奸……不知道该说些什么，你可以说她是噱头，但她真的有别的办法吗？没有。没有。没有。
拍了半部好片，前面半部还算有模有样，场面安排及气氛营造还颇有声势，也能从中看出很多好莱坞类似影片的影子。下半部则一泻千里，完全垮掉，当然这也是影片的整体构思出现了问题。印度人思考问题还挺爱走极端的。
这是一部很棒的女性主义电影。Girls help girls☀
角色脸谱化严重（主角，同学，家人，企业），剧情浮夸尴尬（机器人破解安全设定违反阿西莫夫定律），几处转折十分生硬，传达出来的价值也经不起质疑——表面上将原本纯social的工具转换为带有更多自主意识的pet，实质上这种与pet的互动依然以人际分享为基础，内核不变。——总之不真实也不梦幻。
3.4分。 在社会批判层面来说，这部电影很能挑起情绪，一个幼儿园女老师突然发疯，将十几个孩子绑架要挟，以此引起轩然大波，将警察、大众、舆论和政府高层的视角全都聚焦过来，最终为得是自己的权利诉求，还是很令人动容。换做韩国人，就是《恐怖直播》了，一种对政府全面的不信任，而印度则相反，用充满希望的结局，唤醒社会。 不过片子本身的悬念安排上，或是在细节打磨上，并非很让人信服。女主角的每一次行动，显得过于轻松，警察的刑侦能力又明显太过依从，这就让最后女总理和女主角的面对面对话，不太能掀起高潮情感，而是一场过于顺拐的社会表达。
印度片越来越跳出人们刻板印象了。题材是好的，拍摄手法也比较商业化熟练，只是冗戏和冗镜头实在太多太多
如果这样的星期四，真的在印度发生了，那该多好。
【NO.44】至少还有希望和期待，国内翻（chao）拍（xi）是不是已经安排上了……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
