总相宜 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 喜剧片 1995

导演: 迪克·麦斯

剧情介绍

  6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful.
  A brilliant and outragously funny satire of society, 7 December 1999
  Author: Dave Joerg ([email protected])
  "Flodder" is one of the funniest movies ever made and few people realise that it is a Dutch movie made by none other than the Holland version of John Carpenter, the famous Dick Maas, author and director of the thriller "Amsterdamned". The Flodder family is the reincarnation of the term a-social. When the whole family bunch, basically all bastards, criminals and sluts must be relocated from their City slum because of toxic waste under their house, the city council house no choice. The only available space is in the "Zoendal" - the "Sun Valley" the best area in Amsterdam where all doctors, snobs and businessmen can afford to live their lives. And where the central point of interest and politics is the tennis club of the community. The Flodder family brings devastation to the tranquil world that ruled before. They are simply unbelievable. The characterisation is incredibly funny, beginning with Ma Flodder who searches other people's trash cans for food or making illegal liquor in her cellar and ending with the eldest daughter who is the biggest slut on earth. Together they make the most horrible family imaginable, a sort of immoral mirror image to the Brady Bunch or the Waltons. When the City counsel of Amsterdam hoped that the Flodders would show their good will to be more civilised in their new area, it turns out that Holland's most famous family would rather bring out the worst in the rich people of "Sun Valley"-wonderland. The rest is a hilarious, brilliant and well made social satire that can be watched as a provocative movie as well as a straightforward comedy. Dick Maas at his best. I salute him! Flooder was the Dutch smash hit in 1986 and brought two sequels and a tv series. All of the sequels were nice but not as great as the original.
  Flodders (1986) is available on DVD in Germany in a dubbed German version in Dolby Digital 5.1. under the name:
  "Flodders -Eine Familie zum knutschen"
  Why is First Floor Features, the producer of the movie not bringing the Dick Maas blockbusters out on DVD in the Netherlands, I wonder. The are not even available on video there. These movies have so much potential, still to this day and have a huge silent but true following.

评论:

  • 萱沛 6小时前 :

    220217@uplink京都

  • 锦洁 4小时前 :

    生日快乐,跳舞的青年!2022.7.31 非常夏日的电影,关于曾经那么相爱这件事情,只是想起来一点点。对我来说,比花束般的恋爱好哭多了。

  • 沃心香 2小时前 :

    真是细腻,能有刚好踩上拍的点,大爷讲真理呢

  • 玄寻桃 6小时前 :

    故事结构和结尾妙啊,比同题材的花束多了太多成熟的隐晦和克制,毕竟是更熟龄的男女间的爱情。剧情平淡如白开水,引发的是后劲十足的暗涌的情绪。“だがら....”“ちょっと...”之后藏起来了不交代也能猜到的剧情,把更多的时长给了夜晚空荡小巷里跳舞的长镜头,却显得异常动人和感伤。

  • 晨震 2小时前 :

    ed好好听。看到最后,我还是没能感受到男女主之间深刻的情感连接,很平淡也有些伤感,就那样无疾而终了。没想到发卡是女主送给男主的,不得不说眼光真好,我也喜欢。观影的过程中我总是会联想到那部夜空总有最大密度的蓝色,池松壮亮好适合演这类角色哦。

  • 林蔓 5小时前 :

    墙壁上的电影永远是同一个日期

  • 滑雨凝 1小时前 :

    池松在这部好可爱。烦内,再也不想看爱情电影了。

  • 晨香 8小时前 :

    我大半夜说就去逛逛奥森吧他说好呀

  • 芮傲丝 9小时前 :

    Fantasia 2022@ Concordia 下周去多伦多顺便逛下水族馆吧

  • 野美华 8小时前 :

    #看的不是特别认真,居然是冰淇淋和雨声的导演,完全风格不同,这部很稳,一点不躁,女主真是太可爱,嗓音有股魔力…磁场相同才会互相吸引,分开似乎也是必然的,感觉男主变化也挺大,没想到挺文艺,两人确实少了在一起的可能性吧。

  • 洪千儿 9小时前 :

    被creephype的歌的预告吸引过来。从演员到结构、到不了了之的恋情,虽然在近年日影就很有既视感(伊藤是成为某种专业户了吗?),主题也比较简单直给,但两位主演演的真好,一些互动的细节和路人等细微处很可爱,所以看的还是很上头

  • 桀年 7小时前 :

    city of star are u shining just for me

  • 罕丝娜 5小时前 :

    池松在这部好可爱。烦内,再也不想看爱情电影了。

  • 轩晨 4小时前 :

    (b站群起而攻之的圈地自萌让我越来越感觉这个时代的言论垄断,人们因为同样的观点抱在一起,不是为了取暖,是为了形成合力攻击别人)

  • 杞梓婷 3小时前 :

    主题曲曲名想了好久什么意思,Night on the planet、ちょっと気づいただけ。あ〜お寿司食べたくなった〜🐟

  • 考冰洁 3小时前 :

    比起《花束》更喜欢这部 更能让我感受到共鸣 节奏特别的慢 一点一点抓住我的心 总觉得和我很像 说话有时候很墨迹吧hahaha 好怀念水族馆 夜晚稀少人群的街道 拿着同一瓶啤酒的ふたり 在出租车上放着歌 当然也憧憬过一些..zzzz

  • 浩初 2小时前 :

    电影结束后的舞台挨拶,超乎想象的松散没节奏w两人谈了各自喜欢的《地球之夜》里的片段,聊了沙莉(她真可爱!)出演的CreepHyp的那支mv里最后的搞笑片段ww以及原来片名是池松氏想出来的,导演一开始拟定的名字又土有中二(我记不起来了)。

  • 星震 2小时前 :

    尽管有着相似的故事内核,然而在本片对于生活流敏锐刻画的比较下,《花束》般的日常失真显得多么急躁而缺乏真诚。“稍微想起了一些”本身即意味着一次对于过往的回溯,这一时态以及与之相匹配的叙事手法的选择则大幅帮助影片突破线性时间观的桎梏,进而完成情感的积累与渲染。借由这种回溯,我们也得以重新审视“现在”,正如第一小节所做的那样——大流行病改变的日常与情感剩余的灰烬相伴相随,借由两人的双眼,当下被注视,过往也尽收眼底成为念想。尽管松居的“技巧”在本片中克制稳重很多,但仍然可以看到许多他作品中一以贯之的元素——毕竟他本来就是一位时间流的探索者。

  • 章问玉 9小时前 :

    很闷,又刻意的情节,只在最后“我们在哪里见过吗”情绪上来一点点。

  • 能书意 1小时前 :

    我们都由过去塑造而成,那些偶然回想起的片段,其实早已经成为我们的一部分,那些人,那个人,也是如此。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved