A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
导演不愧是我最讨厌的好莱坞三个导演前2名，缺点依旧。很多人在骂罗琳的编剧，完全没想过要不是罗琳的故事有意思，鬼才看这个垃圾的片子。
基友看完零点场首映后说虐惨了 我紧张地看完全片后 发现原来可以磕的都在预告里磕完了…
其实在电影院乍一看还是很能糊弄人的，感觉是个及格线边缘的奇幻片，魔法打斗的画面挺好看的，可惜顶着哈利波特的名头。大卫叶茨真的不行，节奏情绪调动太差怎么能捧上这么个铁饭碗。这部片主要靠演员魅力撑下来。雀斑明显有点年纪了，但眼神还是那么温柔，侧身避开的视线真让我等社恐感同身受。哥哥每个出现的镜头我都会不自觉微笑。跟TINA有关的几十秒我都疯狂磕到了前两部我还没get不太到。最后邓布利多在街对面看着烘焙店里热热闹闹，自己一人孤独走在落雪的街道。我觉得邓布利多这个人物就此立住了，以后我会带着他内心的孤独重温哈利波特。
离婚后我爸忽悠我堂弟搞起了传销，为了捞人我妈喊上一家老小去砸场。
一场精彩的古着时装秀，你永远可以相信Colleen Atwood。
IMAX北美首映, NYC观众看演员本人我们看直播感受到了差别待遇。剧情不重要，看看可爱动物嗑嗑GGAD就可以了，开场五分钟就有高能台词，CP粉各种福利。很多中国元素，主角小动物的名字我听到后半段才知道他们在念“麒麟”；大战地点是高仿布达拉宫。前半段其实非常精彩，后面剧情有点拖沓有点垮。小雀斑可爱依旧但我眼里只有他哥Theseus！！比我预期的好一些，有动物看我就不挑！
看了很久都看不完，只有嗅嗅的出场最好看。如果强尼戴普还在就好了，他以前好像没有演过gay。
这是什么烂剧情啊。所有角色就差贴个“工具人”的条在脸上了。我试图用逻辑去理解剧情，但显然它没有任何一丝逻辑可言。等了四年，你就让我看这个，我只想大声疾呼：「RNM，退钱！」
看到格林德沃 我就忍不住去想 如果是德普出演的话 ，邓布利多那些深情的告白会演绎成什么样的令人心碎～
小学选班长真是笑死我了。刚分手的邓布利多坐在婚礼门外的长椅上却没有一个人邀请他进去，也太可怜了吧。另外米勒到底是谁？什么叫他也是邓布利多？
感觉就是前面画了一堆悬念大饼，但就乏味流水账
竟然被感动了，会用眼神演戏真的很重要。中文译名应该翻成，邓布利多家的秘密才对吧，整个误会大了。
我很想只给三星 但为了这俩人要甜死了的对视…… 知道自己老相好没被着自己找别人 摸着对方的胸口听心跳……
那种看完之后第二天忘了前一天看了啥的电影。罗琳写剧本比叶茨执导的能力还要弱啊。052622
比上一部好，看到格林沃德的拥护者，看到领导人竞选，看到格林沃德鼓吹种族优劣、视麻瓜为蛆虫，并宣誓要清算麻瓜时，那沉重的历史感忽然呈现在荧幕上，教人不寒而栗。比起德普，麦叔形象更佳，而德普也不是没有优势，内心的狂癫更加外露，各有千秋。
倍速看的，每个人都是小黄人的嗓音，滞后严重的字幕，有的演员口齿清晰有的不行，所以本来也混乱，看得也混乱，就不失为一种经验吧
这电影怎么越拍档次越底了，搞的好像某些电影车工流水线上下来的作品，给钱就能拍的那种，我记得哈利波特宇宙明明更有逼格的。
To 罗琳：写不出来算球了能别瞎写吗😅开头血盟是为了感情我就？结尾摸着胸口问还有谁会爱你我真的大受震撼😮这真的不是什么感情线强硬发展的同人文吗？谁要嗑这种工业糖啊👊所以邓布利多的秘密到底是什么？为什么谁好谁坏人自己看不出来要靠动物啊？为什么魔法部选举要去不丹啊？我真的满头的问号。当然魔法氛围还是不错的，纽特的蝎子舞也很喜欢，但有这个时间我不如再看几遍哈利波特！
多一星给嗅嗅和小麒麟吧，列车上全程看嗅嗅卖萌了
没仔细看，关键剧情有点意思，但反正……will anyone else love you？这句看的有点想哭…
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
