Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
普通发言：我看了两个半钟头的预告片。所以这片子是粉丝向作品么？就算画面再好看但是两个半小时的预告片还是会觉得不爽啊。
只是真的很像某奢侈品牌
IMAX 2D 寰映大融城
在我们的文化消费中，有多少人盲目自大，就有多少人表现得「比西方人更懂西方」。两种情境的社会心理驱动力竟殊途同归——看你把优越感建立在什么一种文化归因上。
在一堆黑白人里面，唯一的华人是个叛徒。
我不懂了，不上8.5我就不懂了。这音效、视觉、情节还不够绝吗？
充满了太多bug的烂片
汉斯季默配乐再次放飞自我，而且依然很…喧闹高分贝，混音师为了平衡所有声音可以考虑申请加工资了。
撑死了一部异域时装秀，出片直接上淘宝店铺首页毫无违和感，十分没劲。
太他妈难看了，如坐针毡！我层次太低，欣赏不了美国文化！
主线： 《梦见了但没完全梦见》
为了能看到续集，我赶紧打了个五星。IMAX DNA级别制作，可惜我没能看IMAX，hans zimmer配乐太牛逼了，维伦纽瓦拍起地理地貌来有塔可夫斯基的范儿。古典文学气质，全片没有高潮，全是崇高！就像老百京没有公路，全是地道！另外甜茶他妈太好看了，甜茶也好看，甜茶和他妈都好看。
全程被汉斯•季默的象牙匕首顶着喉咙，听他嘶吼：我大不大！我大不大？！
我也不理解大家对史诗的定义。看了两个多小时，我甚至不知道男主在想什么。
得吧，大概看了一下原著设定，稍微能理解了，但封建帝国主义这一文明的倒退确实不能让它看起来像是科幻片，这种感觉很割裂，一方面你文明高阶了，但思维却还是封建传教那一套是说不通的。最后，电影是硬核电影没错了。
太耍赖了，应该叫《沙丘1》啊，虽然毫不意外肯定不可能一集拍完但让非原著观众可能会莫名其妙吧。牛蛙是爱甜茶的，拍那么帅，纵观他前作，都是瘦弱病娇又强有力的主角，合作简直是命定的。对原著的忠诚堪称让人感动，我看的时候都产生幻觉了，好几次以为看过这片儿，说明把我看书时脑中的镜像拍出来了，铺陈用心，但有些配角塑造得有些潦草，可以理解。音乐一大败笔，毫无想象力，满得让人撑得慌，别让老头出来坑钱了。还有就是镜头设计太平，剪辑比较无效，尤其不懂留白，很多原本应该击中的中二嗨点过早暴露，牛蛙太直男了，一些细腻抓人的东西他不爱玩儿也玩儿不来。美术做挺足的，合格的奇幻冒险片儿，高糖饮料的饱腹感。
目测至少得拍五部………视觉上的呈现非常好，是电影技术水平发展的成果，也是导演本身确实是当代最适合拍科幻史诗电影第一人。但沙丘的故事，虽然我没看过原著，仅就此序篇看起来还是略旧了。（技术和思想/叙事发展不是同步前进的，过去技术跟不上，现在故事太古典又觉得不够有惊喜。）当然总体观感还是很不错的，甜茶真是天赋异禀可现代可古典可王子可二流子瘦成这样演动作戏也不违和，一众演员都不错，谁能想到最垮是张震………
6.5/10。在困意与扇醒自己来看奇观间切换。并没有读过原著，所以看完最震惊的点是这种故事是如何成为科幻经典的。维伦纽瓦的服化摄影依旧简洁，但也许过素了；同样问题出现在配乐上，有史诗感却过强。不停出现的预言画面强化着电影预告片属性，赞达亚广告般特写多到让我翻白眼。说了很多缺点，但不可否认它可能是十年内最适合大荧幕观看的电影，还有啥自行车！
史诗，一定要去看imax版本，否则你获得的只是沙丘的一半，沙包
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
