Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
偷窥对面专业的摄影师？看到对面是摄影师第一反应不是买窗帘？结尾实在没有必要。
3.5星！眼睛既是欲望的器官也是力比多的投注，如今人们进入他人之生活的权限是史无前例的，人们能预见被认识或不认识的人跟踪或是窥探半真半假的人生，人们创作着剧本，演绎着人生，欲望着他人如我所期的那样欲望着我。
不错的电影，最后报复有些过头了，说白了是个愿打愿挨的事，女主报复后仿佛能洗清自己的责任一样，其实这只是让她的罪孽更重了。 另外，为何不搞姬……都到那份儿上了，假如有这类情节上7分肯定没问题
全都不是什么好人，像女主这种管不住自己下半身的母狗最该死。
欲壑难填，无知蛇吞象；恨错难返，好奇害死猫。当你在凝视深渊的时候，_______。
偷鸡不成蚀把米，看戏反成剧中人。人类悲剧的根源，都是心中无尽的欲望。
凝望与被凝望，反噬与被反噬。悉尼太绝了，我感觉到了被征服。
法国女导演自编自导自演的女性反压迫电影，色调镜头音乐舞美都极为细腻和用心，两个女主的演绎也情绪饱满恰如其分。疯子很多时候是所谓"正常人”的迫害所致，而正常人往往都是集体发疯的“疯子”。这个结局说明了男权社会下的女人无论怎样都是某种悲剧。如果能把两个女主的情感焦灼再刻画的深入一些或许会更好。法国演员好像由内而外酒散发着某种特质。
妖魔化有天分的女性，再割掉她们的舌头，打入父权制牢笼。
永远把别人想得比自己邪恶10倍、能力强大100倍，可能离真相就会更近一些。经典的魅力之一，就是常拍常新。
不过实在是太大了。
Sydney妹妹应该去拍类五十度灰大红大紫等着你
女主眼睛好漂亮。片子很优美，但却缺了点东西，四平八稳的。也算还行吧。画面颗粒质感很好，看着很舒服。
很久没看到把惊悚和情色结合得如此有水准的电影了。除了最后的收尾太过于扯之外，整体观感相当不错。
最后那个镜头啥意思？皮帕也开始观察偷窥新房客了？
4-，看清别人，也就看清自己。影片中看不见的灵魂，便起到这个作用吧，由此带入沟通与情感，对主题和冲突来说，是因也是果。但最后以自由做结，还是简单了点。双女主气质迷人。
喜欢影片的都市质感，但可惜后期崩得太厉害了。要是不出现中二的蛇蝎情节，就止于刺激的寻觅，或许电影的定位会更明确一点，而不是现在的一通乱炖。
虽然反转能猜到但也还是不错。就觉得毕竟是杀人 瞎了感觉还不够？不过女二的高级脸和身材的确很模特很蛇蝎美人。
这片子真的有点尴尬，前半段的窥中窥的设计很出彩，如果到女主去展览现场发现自己被设计了就结束的话，至少值4星，加上三个美女帅哥的肉体可以上5星。但她偏偏要复仇，就画蛇添足沦为平庸之作了。
生动诠释了灵魂出轨&肉体出轨，同时高能反转让人直呼过瘾（甚至轻微涉及了lgbt议题）anyway我真的好爱Cassie妹纸！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
