Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
所以欺骗成功全靠敌人内部跳反？…… 感情线挺败笔的
欧美对于未来和机器人现在看来都是一样的贫瘠，而且他们特别热爱无处不在的广告，这是被资本家打服了？结局就很生硬，从剧情到情节设置总有种眼熟的感觉，这种被机器人关在屋子里的好像也看过其他的，挺无聊的。不过里面的小帅哥很帅
007之父伊恩弗莱明的确曾经给那个讨厌的海军上将作过私人助手，这是个有趣的细节。当然，最重要的是脸叔太帅了。
发乎情，止乎礼。这段感情就像这个电影一样，铺垫了这么多好像最后就差那口气上不去
虽不枯燥，但也没有什么出彩的地方，中规中矩把故事讲了，感情戏完全没必要。
脑洞大，法式幽默。峰回路转，很讽刺。
这片子，就是谍战剧，搞什么惊心动魄，平淡无奇中蕴藏着危机四伏，平静的海面下掩盖着深海的暗流涌动；最终，人们在紧张的等待中迎来“樯橹灰飞烟灭”的结局，国家利益至上，英雄依旧默默无闻——我想，这才是片子要揭示的实质内涵吧…🥃
感情线有些迷惑，算是说清楚了一个故事，感觉详略不太得当
拥有真实情感和瑕疵的才是人类呀，太完美了就跟机器人一样是数据是代码，科技不断发展人类智商反而下降变成了马戏团的动物，这个假想真可怕
二战的短篇小说电影 故事情节本身的单调的确需要添加元素来丰富 丘吉尔戏份不多但很出彩 四人读信的一段最佳 一个虚构人物的信带出三个真人的感情
而作为英伦群像正剧，故事四平八稳，严肃温和。
机器人反抗人类，又有要保护人类，这个也只有用巨型漏洞来自圆其说了。
很早就从袁老师那里知道了这次绝妙的行动，观影时自然好感加分，一些细节还是处理的相当不错。
所有都是假的，只有jean写的那封信是真的
2站中最有名的欺诈战，为西西里登陆创造了条件。
设定烂剧情烂演员烂，随便一部科幻短片都能吊打他，这名导水平也太水了
确实有失水准，但是也有亮点，还调侃了一下新冠；AI的反思；人类是有缺点的原创设计；篇幅和形式更像短集的电视剧；性爱机器男 有了裘德洛的标准 这个就像个智障啊
这故事我上初中就知道了，今天终于看到电影版的了。影片质量还是可以的，服装，道具，布景等做的都比较精细，还有脸叔等一帮实力演员出演，算是有诚意的了。不过对我唯一的问题是，感情戏太鸡肋了，脸叔和莱斯利的感情还有查理对莱斯利的好感在整个剧情里显得可有可无，还不如删掉这部分情感，把时间控制到100-110分钟，做成一部纯军事剧情片，那样还显得更精炼紧张。正常我只会给3星6.7分，不过鉴于是真实故事改编，鼓励一下，我给4星7.1分！
3.5中规中矩
最想看的部分没太看着 没啥必要的剧情和文邹邹倒是蛮多
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
