A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
当人成为问题，成为政绩的目标。/人道主义的微弱提问也被轻易淹没，我们不会因为尽责被指责的。我们这代人只是刚好被选中要为国家剜去病瘤罢了。/获得签字走无意义的手续，是为了让人维持秩序感。法律是可以朝令夕改的，虚假的程序正当才是现实。/Sechs Millionen Juden wurden. 平实的会议纪要之后，这一切才刚刚开始。
啊这 我居然被纯爱感动的流下了泪水 但还是没忍住中场睡着了 为什么感觉万物均可怨灵化 绷带哥露出眼睛太帅了
这么认真详细带有政治博弈地讨论种族大清洗，简直是高级别恐怖片
观看中：狗卷我的狗卷为了你我变成狼人模样为了你我染上疯狂、这就是纯爱之力吗、最强的人来给我卖腐我何德何能。观看后：见了老婆十秒，还有老婆保护学生的珍贵打斗场面，我爱老婆，嘿嘿。
14个背负历史最大反人类、种族清洗、种族灭绝、侵略罪的刽子手，谈笑间重新定义《人道》、《美德》、《高效》、《净化》、《清醒》
最后一段很精彩，应该是秘书长，对于灭绝犹太人政策本事并未直接挑战，他没有直接庇护犹太人，但是，他也知道作为人性的根本，杀人，而且是屠杀，一定会深深扭曲每个人的人性。虽然屠杀者貌似强者，完全碾压众人的生命，但是，他自己之后的生活，精神上的煎熬，将永无止境。
电影场景很简单就是在一个会议室里。他们讨论的仿佛是怎么处理一堆 废弃物品一般。。。将自己的行为上升为和平的举措，不得不做的伟大任务。。。
这个题材比庭审还要难拍，开会的戏演绎的如此优秀。人物鲜明 大量对话很精彩 各方利益的博弈淋漓尽致。最终方案抛出来就是毒气。
细思可怕，不寒而栗的是，一群政治官僚、军人竟然是在法律的框架下，如此“正义凛然”地讨论对一个种族，不计其数的人实行灭绝，最为毛骨悚然的是，明明大家“心照不宣”，却坚持使用“最终解决”这样近似中性的字眼。把一件如此肮脏可耻的事情努力推进成为合法的事情，纳粹可耻！当然也能窥见官僚体系的制衡、博弈，精彩的群戏。
一部令人不寒而栗的电影。当目标是荒谬的时候，一切高效率的国家机器，先进的科学技术，都只会造成更大的灾难。
夏油杰和五条悟真的是好朋友啊
至今没想明白为什么纳粹对犹太人问题如此耿耿于怀？根源难道真的是希特勒本人对犹太的深恶痛绝吗？可是这么病态的想法，为什么在1920s还能够有如此多的受众？就算普通民众容易忽悠，但这些纳粹高层不乏高级知识分子啊。难道他们对犹太人的最终解决，更多是在迎合元首的vision吗？二战1942年德国每况愈下，把这些解决犹太人的人力物力投入到战场上，不好吗？但转而又想，这场战争本来就建立在反犹基础上。
从来没有看完一部电影让我产生无比生理心理不适。恐怖片跟这相比算得上成人童话了。官僚体制会议流程程序至上一切都那么熟悉，就像我们平时开的一次次会议，竟然决定了六百多万人的生死。太恐怖了，太恐怖了，太恐怖了，每个人都没有错每个人都是做自己的工作，那到底是谁的错！是这个体制的错吗？是集权体制的错！是平庸的恶的错！
一场会议决定了1100万犹太人的命运。种族清理和血统清洗真的是荒谬。
这应该是一部恐怖片，几个衣冠楚楚的军人和博士在这个安静的别墅里讨论的却是如此灭绝一个种族……而更可怕的是这是真实发生的，欧洲六百万犹太人被屠杀了。
马趴，第二季快点出！
德国式的仅仅有条减少了部分既视感，不过既视感依然强烈。犹太人要不是那么听话守秩序，纳粹清理他们时一定效率达不到那么高。施害和被害双方通力合作虽然过程不算愉快但结果很是惊人。
以及，最喜欢的曲子是Therapy
突然想到三体地球要被遗弃，而人类的选择，揭示了人性最低劣的那一幕
一千一百万犹太人在大多数与会者眼中只是一个简单的数字……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
