Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
说白了，美国人还是要宣扬那种“为了财富，违法犯罪”很合理的价值观。
续集是公路片，一家人开车环游美国，犹如美国旅游宣传片，美国著名景点一览无余，不过如此走遍美国的剧情设计和剧情实质关联不大，不走景点同样可以完成剧情
亚当斯一家版的《走遍美国》。
虽然剧情很弱智，但是就是很喜欢亚当斯一家这个系列啊~
扣分多，可能因为有几处贬损中国的情景吧。扣1分。
为什么现在的电影都这么无聊了啊！好编剧都去哪里了？电影还看不起中国的山寨，哈哈
剧情简单 鬼马点子没有第一集多 但这个配音阵容不能不爱啊
故事的发生就很直接，大明星被绑架了，然后疯狂逃亡，一边是警察在追击凶手，动作戏港味挺浓的，一边是咖啡店被绑架老板还有实习生。
看开头就猜到了结尾那种
还是觉得The Addams Family并不适合（子供向）动画化，太聚焦真善美就失掉本味了咱就是说。本味是啥，R腥味儿呗【喂】
薅神，我辈楷模，薅无止境，自强不息，止于至薅。。瞄了下原型，惯犯，无卖惨人设，优惠卷是私印，电影淡化美化喜剧化，让大家更容易共情。。以及虽然这桩的确轻判，后来的模仿犯就没那么好运了，嗯，薅还要乘早。。
这俗套的剧情和无聊的主线真是浪费了这么好的制作，全程就为了个身份认同，好无聊哦。
我为钱狂的同类，丢钱的不想追究责任。这要换个地方可以枪毙你
叫你模仿，不是超越。毕竟是韩国电影，还是变态很多！
把那么另类有趣的亚当斯一家，整得如此大众且乏味，真是叫人大跌眼镜。
20220129
感觉对话不是很好懂啊，还得慢慢啃.it doesn't matter how you get to the finish line. just as long as you get there
黄大叔yyds！！！！连一部小成本电影都演技在线
7.7 不错，搞笑，幽默，以优惠券来拍出一部不同路线的电影
花两个小时才能看到“电影”，表演、节奏、配乐都在线，人物塑造也很成功，配角也都挺出彩，以及从写邮件客诉到向FBI报案，到法庭出席，最后给到邮政局案件处理页面的特写，可以感受到美国真的是一个有很多paperwork的国家，也是蛮有趣的。除此之外，还想起之前在台湾的时候，每年下半年就会到院线狂看美国电影的经历，因为疫情影响，最近这两年进电影院的次数也是屈指可数了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
