Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
中规中矩吧，对一个文物爱好者来说还是对胃口，但很多衔接经不起推敲，可能是电影时长的限制吧。葛优的煽情戏感染不到我，是为了煽情而煽情，难以共鸣。（很甜蜜的观影体验）
以及李现的演技在雷佳音的对比下有点不能看。
原来我小时候收到的红狗摇头娃娃就是这只大红狗克里弗。 解答了我小时候对为什么要把狗涂成红色的疑问。
让自己变强大，才能保护你想要保护的东西。人们惧怕他只是因为他有强大的能力。
合家欢的狗狗电影 岁数大了有点看不进去了 红色的狗狗还是很酷的
故事流畅，质感很差。审美较为苏联，古玩行业很封建。年度最没用女性角色黄烟烟，最膈应场景“好生养”，拜托男明星有点长进混了这么多年还不能用原声出演，你葛大爷并不是只能演老年纪春生。
虽然是个普通过时的故事，但是谁不想有一只又大又红彤彤的狗狗呢！
年代感一般。传奇色彩很浓。电影的最大价值在于不用把背景放到民国或者泰国之类。但国产片最大悲哀是当下的背景不能有所谓负面的东西，就好像最近要在电视剧里写一个乞丐（还不出镜）都不被允许，是说“抹黑我们的城市”，原本是给乞丐送快餐反映正能量的，最后乞丐被换成是清洁工，真是讽刺。
根据儿童读物改编的电影，电影化以后，更像是一个都市童话故事，里面有魔法，也有坏人，但更多的是儿童的童真！
“it's New York, no one’ll even notice”,Yeah right, NY ppl don't care. It was way too much for adults but I think it was okay for a six-year old, well,better than eternals还是太弱智了，感觉在低端黑NYC，民风淳朴Harlem，机智神勇NYPD，交通顺畅曼哈顿。但是实在是太过时了吧，邪恶白人科技企业，有钱书呆子亚裔，白女小天使，烂仔逗比叔叔，几亿开销的公司的安保被一帮居民干翻，really, is it the best you can do?看来派拉蒙能垫底苟延残喘不是没原因的。虽然老套弱智但是至少看的不生气，毕竟小狗狗可爱
这是院线？你告诉我这是网大我都信，跟刺杀小说家一个类型的无聊。
额
枯燥无聊的生活还是需要家庭娱乐电影，至少能暖心两小时。
“最后我要感谢我的九年级数学老师，他曾经告诉我我会一事无成，而现在他可以kiss my ass.”，很可爱的儿童片，叙事结构和角色设计非常经典，狗狗很可爱，但loser的英雄故事实在是my favorite，Emily她叔叔很有Roy（in it狂人）的即视感。其实情节有个很大的bug：Emily就养了狗狗不到一天就决定豁出自己的公寓啥啥的去救狗狗，I can get it but it’s quite weird?
为何七岁黄口小儿会习得鉴宝绝技？带着这个疑问看完了满是各种莫名操作的密室逃脱，这个局中局只有祖父是穿越星人可以解释了。ps.李现演技一上大荧幕就露馅了看得难受。
Unique puppy🐕🦺mediocre plot
温暖又可爱，还是最爱的拉拉。女主最后一番发言，让我觉得狗狗的红色象征着纽约社区各人种的大融合大团结😂
我从根上就接受不了原著小说这种几大古董世家追宝的设定。除去个人不喜欢的这个因素，影片就还行的水平。葛大爷的表演，真的独树一帜，也是看到想笑的水平，但和黄渤沈腾不是一码事儿，稍微高级一点。
A good film for a Saturday family movie night.
养狗的人都懂，Clifford好像我家老大。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
